Gagan-Vishwa must take risks to capture the party [Interview]

'To rebel. By doing this, it seems like creating a parallel Congress at first. However, the distance is heavy with the sky and the world. Those who do not understand go to sati with Deuba.'

Ashwin 10, 2082

Kantipur Reporter

Gagan-Vishwa must take risks to capture the party [Interview]

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

Nepali Congress General Minister Gagan Thapa raised the issue of leadership change when Chairman Sher Bahadur Deuba was injured in the hospital bed after the attack by the protesters, and the establishment party is targeting him. Amid this siege, he has made the demand for a special convention his main agenda, which has the support and support of another general minister, Vishwaprakash Sharma.

What direction does this trip of Thapa give to the future of Congress? Focusing on this topic, political analyst Prof. Kulchandra Neupane's conversation with Krishna Khanal :

Two Congress general ministers Gagan Thapa and Vishwaprakash Sharma are promoting the issue of a special convention for party transformation, how do you see it?

Genji movement is a kind of explosion towards the leadership of the current political parties. No matter what kind of game is inside, it will not destroy the system by reaching this point. The system was protected so that leadership alone would not work. This rebellion happened not only in Kathmandu, but all over the country. This is a nationwide revolt against the old leadership of political parties. What kind of leaders do not know that their unpopularity has reached its peak? Sher Bahadur Deuba, KP Sharma Oli and Pushpa Kamal Dahal, who will defend themselves even in this dire situation, are leading the political party. Talking about the Congress, the Congress with Deuba will no longer exist, it will end. Congress has its own long history and background. He has taken great leadership for the change of the country. This is the party that has a history of introducing the idea of ​​new democracy and is still trusted when talking about democracy. Now Deuba will end the party by staying or save the party by leaving, these are two options.

What is the role of Congress General Ministers in these two options and how decisive do you think they can be?

The collective initiative that Gagan and the world have taken now is the work to be done.

However, there are not enough of them in the party structure to remove Deuba immediately?

Gagan and the world must also be able to take risks decisively, when necessary. Not just by talking about the technical structure within the empty party. You have to be able to take risks. How did Congress expel Matrikaprasad Koirala in 2008? Congress has its own history. Bahalwala Prime Minister, party president, hero of movement and revolution, was with India and Nehru, but how did the Congress move forward after leaving the matriarch? Now, the two general ministers of the Congress need to remember the same history to remove Deuba. Deuba should be thrown away as you are no longer the party chairman. If he wants, he can appoint someone as caretaker till the convention. There may still be an alternative. No, if you are not ready for this option, you have to leave by force. The Genji Movement forced the incumbent to leave. This means that Deuba of Congress and President of UML Oli have been dismissed. If he does not agree to leave the leadership of the party now, he should leave in the same way.

Democratic party also needs some method and process to replace the party chairman, right? A

party requires some rules and regulations. It is not a matter of reaching forty percent, not reaching there. There are two chief ministers. The General Ministers who brought so much popular vote will now take over the party saying that we will rule it. If Deuba does not cooperate, if he does not leave, if the party is to be saved, he must be removed even if it is forced. The current situation is very serious. First, there is the question of whether the election will be held at the appointed time or not. Also, if the Congress goes to the polls under this condition, no one under the age of 30 will vote for the Congress and the UML. It comes to zero for the Congress. Congress will not get votes when new voters increase and old voters decrease. This is the way to succeed Congress. Congress still has high hopes for heaven and the world. I hear people talking about them with hope on the road, in the streets and in meetings. If Gagan comes, it will be a little bit. Public opinion is also against them.

A section of the society, the young generation of the party has hope for the sky and the world, but the establishment, which is strong in the party structure, is now under siege against them. How do you think heaven and the world can move forward in this situation?

is revolting. By doing this, at first it seems like creating a parallel Congress. However, the distance is heavy with the sky and the world. Those who do not understand go to Sati with Deuba. Are you saying that

should take the risk of creating a parallel Congress?

Deuba has to take a risk saying he doesn't agree. It is not my point that parallels should be made. Congress has its own history. In 2008, after removing Matrika Koirala, BP did not form a parallel Congress. The parallel will be made by the Deuba group. If the strength is enough, the majority will remove it, if the strength is not enough, it will be claimed. By the time he reached the convention, Deuba himself would be in the minority. However, you have to claim it. You have to take risks. After the two chief ministers get together, the party will take over and move forward.

Kantipur

Link copied successfully