CPN-Maoist also participated in the meeting organized by Madhesi People's Rights Forum, Nepal at Rice Mills Chair in Gaur, Rautahat for 7 March 2063. But the meeting of both could not be held. Instead, there was a clash. 27 Maoist workers were killed.

Even if the party to be killed is Maoist, who is the party to be killed? Is it a strategy in the forum or are there other reasons ? This aspect was always limited to suspicions and accusations, the truth never came out. The family of the deceased and the injured have not received justice. The Supreme Court has given a mandate to investigate the accused in this incident, which is sometimes discussed and ignored. Rajesh Mishra and Kishore Dahal conversation with Upendra Yadav, who was the president of the forum at that time and now JSP, Nepal about the Gaur incident and his analysis and future path for Kantipur

Rajesh Mishra

and

Kishore Dahal

:

Where were you when there was a violent clash between the then CPN Maoist and Madhesi Janadhikhar Forum workers in Rautahat on 7th Chait 2063 ? What were you doing?

That day I was in Kathmandu . A discussion program was organized with the intelligentsia, so I was busy with it. An unfortunate incident happened in Gaur at that time.

news and party mechanism. I was surprised . I thought, 'Did this even happen? Who did this ? How did such an unfortunate event happen?' How did you find out about the Gaur incident? What was your first reaction? I came to know about the incident from

Even though you have revealed your ignorance, many consider you as the strategist of that event, right?

That is totally wrong . Let me discuss a little background on it . The then Madhesi People's Rights Forum, Nepal was conducting a peaceful and non-violent movement. The interim constitution issued on January 1, 2063 did not include federalism, republicanism and inclusiveness. Many fundamental rights were missed. There was no identity . There was no provision for the rights of Madhesi, tribals, Dalits, women or minorities. We protested against that constitution from 7 am on 2nd January 2063 . We burned the symbol of that constitution.

We were arrested . Initially placed in Baneshwar . Later, Hanumandhoka was taken and kept for a few days. Again Singhdarbar was brought to the police circle . When preparations were made to prosecute the crime against the state, we also asked to do so. Statement was taken with us for burning the constitution. We also said, "It's burnt, we'll burn it again". We said that the constitution was not right, we did not like it, it was not in the interest of the people, so we burned it.

The commission formed under the leadership of a former judge of the Supreme Court said that the incident happened when the Maoists attacked the Forum meeting and the people rose up in protest. But it was not known who were the people who got into the confrontation, how the confrontation took place with whom. Our plan was not like that. It was not our policy to get into a confrontation. In Rautahat, our people were not there, the organization was also weak.

There were protests in different parts of the country against our arrest. Closed in some places. At the same time, a bandh was also organized in Lahan. At that time, a Maoist vehicle came from the east to go to Chitwan. That car stopped . Later firing took place from the vehicle and Ramesh Mahato was killed. He was associated with Madheshi Janadhikhar Forum, Nepal (now Janata Samajwadi Party, Nepal) student organization. After Mahato's murder, the protest program intensified.

In some places there was an attempt to disrupt the protest program. Maoist had come to the parliament. He also had an army. YCL had a big big . He also made a camp in YCL bootball. Those YCLs went and attacked the general assembly organized by us in Bhairahawa . Although they tried to thwart it, the meeting was successful. They also attacked and burnt our assembly in Nepalgunj. Meetings were being held in the midst of protests and attacks in places. There were no unpleasant incidents.

Meanwhile, our friends organized a public meeting in Gaur . He informed the district administration office 15 days in advance and took permission for the peaceful program. Preparations for holding a meeting at the rice mill in Gaur have progressed . My friends requested me to come too. I said I would try too . But I got busy in Kathmandu.

We had taken permission to hold the program in the square, Maoist announced two days ago that the program will be held in the same square without taking permission. For that, YCL was collected from different districts.

At that time, a wave of forums started in that area as well. Twenty thousand people gathered from villages for the meeting. As far as I know, the Maoists hurled grenades and opened fire when the forum meeting was about to end. Then the forum workers who were on the stage fled . But during the conflict, the people of Rautahat were angry with him because of the kidnapping, violence, looting, and collection of donations by the Maoists. On the other hand, in Madhesh, the people started understanding the forum as an alternative to the Maoists. At the same time, after the Maoists attacked the platform of the forum, a clash took place because they were already angry with him. Then the accident happened .

is a meeting held by the then Madhesi People's Rights Forum with permission from the government for a peaceful and non-violent program. But the incident happened. In that regard, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Human Rights Commission investigated. Unmin was . Two judicial commissions were formed under the leadership of Supreme Court Justice Khilraj Regmi and Patan High Court Chief Justice. The police administration had also done its investigation. All of them have almost the same conclusion - Prabhu Sah took the Maoist YCL and attacked it, which led to a double confrontation .

There's something I don't understand either . The state was. If two meetings are held in the same place, we should think about how to make the environment safe. From the industry and commerce association, the civil society had requested the Maoists to allow the forum itself to hold the meeting. They came to find a reason by breaking the agreement about that. While all this was happening, the police administration was not present at the venue. CDO's phone was not picking up. I wonder why they left the meeting place without taking security measures .

is an unfortunate incident but there is also some exaggeration . But the deceased was found several kilometers away. Why did that happen? Because, the Maoist was wearing a dress . And all were outsiders. Workers brought in from different districts had different faces. He had not even seen the way there. The man who had gone there under his leadership escaped . In this way, those workers were put in the pre-existing anger towards the Maoist . A week after the

incident, I also reached there . I thought that something would be found, but nothing was found. Later, Madhesi People's Rights Forum, Nepal also formed a commission to investigate. The commission formed under the leadership of a former judge of the Supreme Court said that the incident happened when the Maoists attacked the forum assembly and the people rose up in protest. But it was not known who were the people who got into the confrontation, how the confrontation took place with whom. Our plan was not like that. It was not our policy to get into a confrontation. In Rautahat, our people were not there, the organization was also weak.

Then who do you and your party see as responsible for the incident?

Those who didn't take permission for the program, attacked another's meeting, they are responsible. If they had not attacked like that, perhaps the incident would not have happened.

At that time, you were accused of bringing down the incident at the instigation of Hindus and royalists, right?

At that time, Prachanda used to make accusations in his speech. He used to say, "This Madhes movement was caused by extreme Hindus and royalists". While both things were wrong . Later they "realized" it. A committee was formed within the party for the internal investigation conducted by the Maoists. The conclusion was that this incident happened due to Prabhu Shah's wrong actions. It has been found guilty that he is guilty. There is truth in that too . After the

, our movement grew. The talks were also going on. Prachanda also participated in the talks. As if he himself is present when the agreement was reached on February 8, 2064. Girija Prasad Koirala and we have signed there . Meanwhile, the election of the first Constituent Assembly was completed. Then Prachanda and his friends sent a proposal to meet once. Our friends were telling us not to meet . But we are ready to meet as politics does not happen without meeting and talking. Then we met with Prachanda, Baburam Bhattarai and Mohan Vaidya in a hotel.

In the meeting with the Maoist leader, I asked the first question - 'Why did you do such an incident in Gaur?' Their answer was - 'It was a mistake on our part.' They said that their friends made a mistake, we realize that. They said let's move forward together. If the allegations made by the Maoists after the Gaur incident were true, then they would not have come together. The internal decision of their party would not be of that type. Later we started to cooperate. After the election of the first Constituent Assembly, we made Prachanda the Prime Minister. We worked together. We even fought some elections together. Later, Baburam also came to our party.

How did this issue come about?

For a long time there was no issue about the Gaur incident. But some said that they should register the case . Such issues should have been addressed immediately. Nothing was done at that time. The Supreme Court also ordered an investigation years later. Also, there has been an investigation on this incident before. National and international organizations have researched . Based on that the file should have been closed or continued . Why didn't it ?

Based on all this, I have not been able to understand three things regarding the Gaur incident. First, why was there no presence of the administration at the venue ? Second, how was the plan for such an event to happen? Where did you come from? Thirdly, after four/four investigations, the case should have been closed or moved forward . Why was it brought forward now after almost 19 years without doing so ?

Isn't it natural to wake up at some point until the factual and legal solution to the incident in which 27 people were killed and dozens injured?

It would have been fine if it had been released on time . After 19 years, the Supreme Court had to issue a mandate. Why did it take so long? Why did the order come now? Another thing, there are a lot of research reports. Some of them have not been made public. The judicial inquiry conducted by the Supreme Court and High Court judges should have been made public. Despite this, the case was not settled, the rest was kept . It's mysterious .

is indirectly blamed on you. You are saying that you are not guilty. Then you are also not pressured to finish on time, why ?

I have said many times to end this topic . But the leaders used to say that "all issues will be resolved at once". He used to talk about the peace agreement and everything would be finished once and for all, Gaur used to say that there is nothing in the incident . He took it lightly. But it is a big thing to file a petition against the one who got angry. However, charging someone and filing a plea does not constitute conviction. At the time of political revenge, petitioning was also common. We also could have registered ten petitions against someone . We didn't go there . We emphasize reconciliation. I took a proposal to the cabinet that the families of those who lost their lives should be given relief. Also accepted . The work is also done . It is not clear why this topic has come forward in such a background.

Two political parties join the Gaur incident. Is the incident criminal or political? What is your own analysis?

The meeting organized by us at that time is political. Attacking someone's assembly is not political. However, basically this is a political event. The meaning of political, during politics, the actions that are done on the political program, are political . But the 'action' that was, went wrong.

Even if you call it political, the families of those who died in the Gaur incident and the injured went to the court seeking justice . Because of that, a decree has also come. If the incident was only political, this would not have happened, would it? It is natural for a

case to go to court and get an injunction. It's just delayed. It is not the case that there is no case. Now be fair investigation and research & nbsp;. Come out of its authenticity and nbsp; 5 Let's make public the report of the then commission of the report that has not been released so far and NBSP;. In doing so, many things are different from it & nbsp;. Making a commission but not the public that does not make the public deculate, the tendency is in Nepal and Nbsp ;. The report of the commission became hesitated, unmatched the style that does not or she doesn't, it's right and NBSP;.

is analyzing the specific status of the Council of Ministers, the Court's order is analyzed by adding to a political organization even more than a regular process and Nbsp ;. At that time, when the Supreme Come, you have analyzed from angle from similar angles.?

stop 19-19 years, why is it why? What's why I'm trying to attack and try to attack and the nbsp? So somewhere, there is some form of political equality and nbsp.. Definitely the politics has an enclosed & nbsp; 5 Don't be somewhere in the smell and nbsp; 5 What is your comment to the Merchant's Appointment for the Employer of the

!?

court that has given a promotion & nbsp ;. That's what he does is & nbsp;. It doesn't mean not to 'internet' after someone adding an incident and nbsp;. He says about the research and NBSP;. This is the work of the court & nbsp;. Therefore, due to abroad, it is not a job to bring the court into a controversy and NBSP;. The court's decision is to honor & NBSP;.

I will help the investigation of the court for the date of the court and nbsp;. We also benefit us if truths come out and nbsp;. The work of keeping the incident as a mystery, also ends the work of keeping false accusations and ends the confusion into the people. But the investigation must be fair & nbsp;.

now and how to do the investigation and how to have to do & nbsp;?

will be guided by the privilege of coming to the Supreme Court to that so and nbsp;. We are not getting not enough right now and Nbsp ;. But my current emphasis is to make a public the past and Nbsp ;. Absolutely a 'water milk, water' and nbsp. I concluded, it is political thing, even though 'Action' is wrong in Guar and NBSP;. The main reasons is political & nbsp;. The solution should also be tried from the political way and Nbsp;. • How to look for a solution from the political way and nbsp;?

before we have requested the government, let's form the Leading Out-General Parliamentary Communication Committee for and Nbsp;. Let's bring the whole fact out through that and Nbsp ;. Before that, let's make public the past and NBSP;. If you start thinking that it should be considered not to be released and against who oppressed it against whom, there is more injustice? Sant-Break Gaur is about that the file of the incident is about to 'hanging swords with you and nbsp;?

can fall on the sword in such a swinding of the sword and nbsp;. The day falls out of truth, falls out to hang out swords, you fall out to hang swords and nbsp ;.

s is now discussed that power is now seeking pressure on you and NBSP;. At the same time, Gaur arrived a topic in the front and Nbsp ;. If you are watching it by watching it and nbsp;?

my question is the same & nbsp;. It's all what is & nbsp;? Why did Georical event come after 19 years and Nbsp;? The journalists were also had to find it and NBSP;. We are also looking for & NBSP;.

was not unable judgment for such an event, some accused and apprehension to have a long time to have a long time and NBSP;. What lesson can our state mechanism learn to make such incidents to be better untouched? How can you prepare for & NBSP;? What is the

state what is & nbsp;? The problem is here & nbsp;. Your intention is that the desire to keep

and want to use your own compatibility;?

is that unfortunate for the country and NBSP;.

you or your party has been gone in government & nbsp;. Why didn't this incident not conclude?

I have repeatedly offered & NBSP ;. I have said this and NBSP;. But it was very taken lightly as 'nothing'; NBSP;. In the meantime, many government has been achieved and NBSP;. But the state responsibilities of the state is not fulfilled and NBSP;. You may know that

had been investigated by your party without repeating the government that your party had not been investigated in this incident and no nbsp;?

is not so & nbsp;. Instead, we have been offering to come to the conclusion of this while living in the government and NBSP;. Prachanda was the first time I was the Foreign Minister, and NBSP;. At that time, I said, 'I have said how, to do this event,' and nbsp; 5 He also said that it was mysterious, "not felt, 'Could not understand'? Some incidents are mysterious and NBSP;. For example, the paid hallscand & nbsp;. What one has put in Yootub, has put it my mysterious and NBSP;. The government would not stay with National International Paripes and he would not have confusion if he had investigated it at investigation and NBSP;.

is being such as it is, and NBSP;. The state is held and Nbsp ;. Unavoidably, may either have to finish someone as weapon may have been used as weapon ,& Nbsp ;.

Garre seems to suffer and nbsp;. His 27 workers are killed & nbsp;. Many have been injured for & nbsp;. But the government has become the four-point four times as led by them and Nbsp;. Many times have participated in the government and Nbsp ;. Still, not taken initiative to conclude it to conclude and nbsp;? What is your understanding & nbsp;?

was good if it was unsuccessful and NBSP;.

now this incident is the way to finding the conclusion & nbsp;? Storm-BREAK will be assimilated in the instructions given by the court, free from fair, pregnant and political intention; We are in favor of such an investigation & NBSP;. We help & nbsp;. It is happening, but let's commit the report of the previous investigation and NBSP;. The trend is not the process of stumbles by one accused & nbsp;.

is seen that the banks and UML are preparing to remove the Indira Ranira Ranira Ranira Rana Rana Rana, the Indira Ranira Rana Rana.. How have you seen it up & nbsp;?

is, I have heard so ith & nbsp; 5 The dispute is seen within the Congress and Nbsp within the Congress. We have not discussed the and NBSP;. Khals has not been able to understand it well and NBSP;. The Congress was also represented by the Congress to discuss the issue to discuss

Setrical Subjectors, nic.

Congress has any of our touch positions and & nbsp;? If someone calls, it is not uncommon for them to go there and Nbsp ;. The political parties should be dialogue among the political parties and NBSP;. What to do is & nbsp;? That was different & NBSP;. But, the dialogue must be and NBSP;. Why does the Congress do not know why and NBSP;? UML will call tomorrow and nbsp;. We are the President of the dialogue, cooperation and subformation and NBSP;.

the party you led by you, Kupa is near to the evegoing party, or nbsp;? In collaboration with opposition parties & nbsp;? Which front is you & nbsp;? In

Parliament we sit on the opposition benches & nbsp;. There are in opposition & nbsp;. Our own front is & nbsp;. Federal Democratic Front & Nbsp ;. We only belong to there is & nbsp;. We are still there at any front of the front & nbsp;. The

has passed a year for a year's period of the Congress and UML to have exceeded a year period. How do you evaluate the government's workers & nbsp;? If the

government was satisfactory, we continued support and NBSP;. If we are unsuccessful, not satisfying and return it to NBSP;. One year is supporting the government and nbsp. Two major parties had made some commitments while forming a government and Nbsp ;. First, the country would be good governance and Nbsp ;. However, Kusharation has been promoted and nbsp;. There was another, NBSP to correct the economy;. The economy is the base & nbsp;. Corruption control was spoken and nbsp;. Dina has been becoming public and Nbsp;. And, there was another important thing to amend the constitution and nbsp;. We also have more concerns and nbsp;. Not a satisfactory work in any of the four commitments & nbsp;. That is why we are back and NBSP;. Another thing is that the government does not need to support our support and nbsp ;. There is a majority in order to run a majority and nbsp;. Not in our opinion that nothing bad will be damaged and NBSP;. The exact bench of the government would not be where there was no place for a satisfaction in the government, and nbsp;.

said the number represented by your party would make no difference by the government and nbsp ;. But, you are looking at the country of National Assembly and Nbsp ;. The government had to take the land anointing of the land ordinance without finding you and Nbsp ;. What will be your role in the national assembly in the coming days? The

country and the people who come in the interest of the people we support the bill or the proposal and the offerings of the people and nbsp;. We help & nbsp;.

means that the government's land ordinance is not in the national interest and nbsp;?

is, not in the interest of that country & nbsp;. Be Standing Standing & Nbsp ;. We should not tell & nbsp; 5 It is done in the rest of ordinances & Nbsp ;. At present, the same ordinance has been brought as a bill of ordinance as a similar bill and Nbsp;. What are the major reasons for protest in the

Land Bill.

are two-three reasons & nbsp; 5 There is something to give land to stay a forest and nbsp;.. The forest is the crime crime, criminal crime is good and nbsp;. If you are to set people on the forest, it will be a forest wine and & nbsp;? One constellation of the forest is increasing & nbsp;. The second is the jurisdiction of the land territory in Article 109 in Article 109; Province requires the agreement on the work of the regional of the states and nbsp;. The law of the subject is to make it up to the states of the subject. Making the association is against the constitution and nbsp;. The constitutional case of the Supreme Court is that only the agreement should be under the agreement of the state of state only for the convention of the state of the state's state (NBSP;. The provisions in the next bill are objectionable & nbsp;. This has been advocated to the real estate business (Real State) & Nbsp ;. Land to 'Real State' Business to Make a Law and Nbsp;? That country is in the interests & nbsp;? There is also a matter of view and nbsp;. Governor is the basis of Grameen Life and Nbsp ;. He also registers it and lets sell it and nbsp;? The government is trying to bring the "dialog 'for the protection of media, is trying to bring law to finish the forest on the other hand, and Nbsp ;. Intervention of Execution in the bill, the intermediate land between the forest where there is a blank space, there is something to settle there and nbsp. Not only we, many are protesting and Nbsp ;. You, the media is also writing and NBSP;. Let the government 'confirm' not to everyone & nbsp;. Your party was not with your parties brought to the land ordinance brought by the Government of the government & nbsp;. The government left the government from that and nbsp;. So, what role do you play in Parliament to the Bills brought about? The

ordinance was brought as a bill by 'copper patterns' and nbsp;. We don't we do if we come there again and nbsp;. It's not in the interest of this country & nbsp;. In one mannering the country, it is not along with us to support the earthquake and the land brokers, and Nbsp ;. How will you make your votes in other bills to bring by

Sarca?

we are helping and NBSP;. Which is in favor of the bills of the public & nbsp; 5 We have automatically helped & nbsp;. At that time, the government was brought to the government and Nbsp;. We restrict only to one's only & nbsp; 5 7 That is why our opinion can be cooperated with our vote and nbsp.

your government used a long time for the Medhesh Pradesh & nbsp;. Now if it is now against & nbsp;. How have you seen the work of the Madhes Pradesh work ??

is not in a position to work with any states of any states & nbsp ;. They are in embarrassing & nbsp;. Not the administration is not the-administration, neither has no law, no authority over the resources; Not even budget & nbsp;. Even though there is a little budget, there is no employee to implement it and NBSP;. No state has been able to work well in that situation and nbsp;. And, not given & nbsp;..

is trying to return to his party leading to his party and nbsp;. Nist of the Congress and the UML that can be co-cooperated with the Congress and the UML are also heard nbsp;? Let

tell him as discussed, but nothing is more than there.

also led the Ministry of Foreign Ministry and Nbsp ;. World Politics, even in our neighborhoods, appears every day every day and Nbsp;. How do you look for Nepal's diplomacy in this situation and nbsp;?

is talking about, somewhere that the government is at some point to work in the national interest and nbsp;.. Nepal is losing a major opportunity & nbsp;. China has already prompted development by modernizing and nbsp;. India is being developed & nbsp;. With these two countries, Nepal could be developed on the basis of endeavors and Nbsp;. Nepal could take that benefits or NBSP;. From India, from India, from China, also & nbsp ;. But, that profit has no longer or nbsp.. Has been a big stake here & nbsp;. Whether both lack of reliability with both countries and nbsp;... Representatives on both of us expresses such intentions & nbsp; 5 It is important to increase the reliability of allies nations and Nbsp ;. कतिपय कुरा समीक्षा र छलफल गर्नुपर्छ । विज्ञहरूबाट राय–सुझाव लिनुपर्छ । त्यस्तो काम हामीले गर्दैनौं । अरू मुलुकमा संस्थागत रूपमै राय लिने, विश्लेषण गर्ने, सुझाव लिने चलन हुन्छ । हामीकहाँ नेतृत्वमा को आउँछ, उसको मुडअनुसार नीति हुन्छ । यसरी हुँदैन ।