Controversy broke out after Jhalnath Khana, a respected leader of the CPN United Socialist Party, said that the justification for forming the UML by dividing it could not be confirmed. Because of this expression, Khanal is ready to be asked for an 'explanation'. After the corruption case was filed against President Madhav Nepal, the question of ethics has been raised. Is Khanal about to be punished after raising questions about Nepal? Ikantipur had a conversation with Samajwadi Vice President Beduram Bhusal about this.

Jhalnath Khanal, the respected leader of the party, has said that the split of UML has not been justified.

How justified is it to say that it was a mistake to make this party? Is it because I have to accept it as I say? What he did was done according to what method? Is it moral to say that it was wrong to make a party without standing in the party committee? If so, what would be confirmed? Will it be justified only by being a big party and ? The political document was unanimously passed in the convention. He kept silent at that time . At that time, Madhav said that Nepal should be led. Jhalnathji should have gathered people to support him and take the leadership. It becomes a serious matter if you walk away saying that there is no reason to make a party.