There is a difference of opinion between the ruling Congress and the UML regarding the land bill. The Congress became suspicious after the Bill was put on the agenda to be passed by the House of Representatives without discussing the amendments. According to sources, the bill was placed on the agenda by Speaker Devraj Ghimire on the instructions of Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli in the House of Representatives meeting on Wednesday. Congress General Minister Bishwa Prakash Sharma and other leaders raised objections, but even though it was removed from the agenda on that day, the dispute remains whether the bill should be sent to the committee or not. Kulchandra Neupane of Kantipur had a conversation with Minister of Land Management, Cooperatives and Poverty Alleviation Balram Adhikari on this matter:

Because of the Congress, the land bill has been removed from the agenda of the parliament ? Not a

, they didn't inform me. It is not known whether it has been removed or not. I learned that the Congress has expressed some doubts . Some clauses have been amended. There is something that needs to be clarified. There is a voice that the controversial bill should be taken to the committee without passing it through the fast track while bringing the

ordinance. There is nothing to take to the

committee . Some amendments will proceed after they become clear. Many things have become clear. The discussion has progressed . There is something left, after everyone agrees, it will proceed .

The Congress has said that there should be an amendment in the bill that the land exceeding the limit taken for other purposes can be sold for housing purposes, right?

is a bit more related to real estate and housing. Suspicions were raised that other land will also go in the name of housing . But that is the context of housing, it is not connected with others . We have written clearly - it cannot be sold except for the purpose for which it is taken. Cannot be transferred.

What is your opinion about the amendments made by Congress General Ministers and other leaders?

It is clear in the bill that real estate transactions cannot be done for any purpose other than obtaining permission. Congress is asking to be more clear. Let's discuss and arrange . Why object to discussing the

committee?

is nothing different. Only 3 points are amended. No need for deep discussion . After going to the committee, the process is long . The commission has been formed but it has not been able to work until the law is made. So we are trying to take it to the fast track .

is passed in this convention ?

happens, happens . It has been passed by agreement in this convention. It is also being discussed within the Congress. Let's consult if there is anything.

Why the rush when the president has held the ordinance and has not approved it?

The President has held for two days saying that he will look into the matter of land . Not because of disagreement . There was no objection from the President's side.

Is it a rush for vote politics? Not a

 . Not only the current one, the previous government also tried to bring it. This is a program put forward by all parties. For the landless, squatters and unorganized dwellers .

Giribandhu is also accused of being connected with tea estate, isn't it? Not a