The Madhesh-centric parties, which have always suffered from division, have come closer after the ruling party Congress and UML debated the need to amend the electoral system and reduce the number of parties in the parliament by increasing the threshold. Seven parties, which have been doing politics on the issue of Madhesi, Tharu and tribals, announced the 'Union Democratic Front' on Thursday.

LOSPA led by Mahant Thakur, Jaspa Nepal led by Upendra Yadav, Rashtriya Mukti Morcha led by Rajendra Mahato, Janamat led by CK Raut, Janata Pragatisheel led by Hridayesh Tripathi, Civil Immunity led by Resham Chaudhary and Tamalopa led by Vrishesh Chandra Lal have blocked the front. 

Jaspa led by Ashok Rai, which split from the party led by Upendra Yadav, has not joined the front. Janata Pragatisheel Party president Hridayesh Tripathi Kantipur's brief conversation about the justification for the formation of the front and the future course of action: 

After nearly a decade, why did you need a front?

was being attempted for a long time. Only the results are visible now. There is only one kind of artificial polarization going on in the country. The meeting of Congress and UML is also an example of that. It has become a topic of discussion as a challenge to another republic. In particular, the issues of tribals, tribes, Madhesi, women, Dalits and Tharu or institutional discrimination are not discussed. Attempts are being made to divert from these agendas. The front is needed to bring it to the right place.  What is the main purpose of the

front?

to stop the unnatural polarization in the country. And, to protect and strengthen the agenda of the Federal Democratic Republic and the achievements of various movements.

Lately, royalist organizations have become active. The king is talking about returning. How does your front take it?

Federal Democratic Republic is our commitment. All the seven parties affiliated to the front are determined and committed to it. We don't have anything below that. So it makes the concept of front very clear. 

There is a coalition government of two major parties in the country. How do you evaluate the functioning of the government?

The government is gradually failing on every front. People are disappointed. Negative commentary has been prepared for political parties and leaders. This situation has brought liquidity. Liquidity can lead to risk and risk can lead to accidents. 

And some of the parties affiliated to the front are in the government and some are in the opposition, how can harmony be achieved?

It doesn't matter. The 26-point commitment of the front is the common opinion of all those who are in the government, in the opposition or outside the parliament. There is a uniformity to it all. 

Ashok Rai's participation in the government didn't seem stuck in the Janata Samajwadi Party Front? What could be the reason?

Initially we ran a discussion for 'Loose Alliances'. He was with them for that. They were of the opinion that we should stay in a 'loose alliance' rather than in the front. However, after most of the parties agreed to form a front, they could not come to the front immediately. But, I believe. come We are together again in terms of 'Loose Alliances'.  Who will lead the

front? Is there a problem between the parties?

no. There is no such dispute or discussion. There is no leader in the front. We have practiced the front a lot. The leader of the party. Where does the meeting of the front take place? He presides over the meeting. Media combination is done by him. He arranges the lunch. Take turns. It lacks leadership skills. 

why Mahanth Thakur and Resham Chaudhary were absent from the Morcha announcement stage?

Resham Chaudhary's party is holding a meeting in West Terai. He sent a representative. Mahanth Thakurji could not come due to illness. has signed the commitment letter. 

The royalist organization/party, the opposition Samajwadi Morcha, has come to the streets. The party in government has tried to form a republican front. At that time you have also joined the front. Blockade everywhere? What was the result?

I said earlier that whatever unnatural work was being done, we were united to stop it. An attempt is being made to divide the country by commenting on republicanism and monarchy. Issues such as federalism, representation of proportional inclusion are becoming at risk. In that regard, the issue does not arise in anyone's meeting or front.

seems to be depreciating rather than enriching the achievements. It is evident from their recent expressions and behavior that those who promulgated the constitution took it there. Look at representation in Parliament through the proportional system. It is not brought for leaders-wives or contractors. It is brought for the weak side. There is a tendency to abuse oneself and blame the system. A front has been made to tear all that down.