The accusations and counter-accusations between the two top leaders have heated up the political market once again.
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
Disputes have been created one after the other in almost all the political parties represented in the parliament. Because of the dispute, there have been incidents in some parties, big or small, from asking for clarification to expelling the party, but the party in power has not even tried to divide other parties to show strong votes in their favor.
The accusations and recriminations between the two top leaders of the CPN United Socialist Party, which was formed separately from the then UML in the year 2078, have heated up the political market once again. Jhalnath Khanal, a member of the CPN Secretariat and former Prime Minister, who was undergoing treatment in India at the time of his separation from the UML, and who was internally unwilling to separate from the UML, said that it was wrong to leave the UML. After making the statement, a surface confrontation was seen between the president Madhav Kumar Nepal and respected leader Jhalnath Khanal.
Looking at the history of repeated clashes and reconciliations between Nepal and Khanal, political companions since 2032, this disturbance may seem normal. But this time's chaos seems different from the chaos in the past.
Khanal's view on Nepal changed after the authority filed a case against the party president for misappropriation of Patanjali land. Since then, Khanal has been holding the view that the president should leave the party on moral grounds.
– Sujan Devkota , Palungtar-4, Gorkha
