We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
It is the duty of every citizen to protect the constitutional republic and democratic values of Nepal, but this responsibility is heavier on the shoulders of the head of government.
It is the duty of every citizen to protect the constitutional republic and democratic values of Nepal, but this responsibility is heavier on the shoulders of the head of government. On May 11, Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's statement at UML's Bagmati state level ward president training program that 'Kathmandu should be under the control of UML on May 15, be ready for the direction of the party' has raised serious questions.
Although such statements are intended to ideologically counter the perceived display of monarchism, provocative words such as 'control' and 'occupation' can lead to the risk of social tension, violence and anarchy. The Prime Minister of the country should not sow chaos at such a sensitive time, but should play a parental role using restrained language.
The Constitution of Nepal (2072) has ensured the right to peaceful demonstration and freedom of expression. If the protest that the royalist is supposed to do on May 15 is lawful and peaceful, then it is within the constitutional right. In such a situation, the responsibility of maintaining peace and security lies with the state apparatus - Nepal Police, Armed Police and local administration, and not with the party workers. Prime Minister Oli's statement conveys the message that workers have been entrusted with 'Kathmandu control', which is against the principles of democratic governance and rule of law. State institutions are under the Prime Minister, so why the expression of inciting workers? This question has raised serious doubts about the government's intentions and accountability.
This expression of Prime Minister Oli not only increases the risk of violent confrontation, but also harms social harmony and democratic values. In the past too, his power-centered and provocative expressions (such as: the dissolution of parliament in 2077 and the allegation of violating the code of conduct in the 2079 election) have caused controversy. Such statements may encourage activists, but in the long run it leads to social division and instability. As the guardian of the country, the Prime Minister should represent all citizens, not just his party. Words like 'Kathmandu Occupy' give the impression of an authoritarian style, which is also against the spirit of republican Nepal.
Mr. Oli, you are the prime minister of the country, not of the party. Therefore, play a restrained parental role and mobilize the constitutional mechanisms of the state to maintain order. Do not give messages that incite workers to violent activities. Monarchist demonstrations can be defeated through ideological and democratic means. There is no need for provocative language and chaotic tactics. Don't let people feel fear and insecurity! Instead, give a message of unity. People are asking questions and the answer to this question depends on your moderation and responsibility.
– Santosh Simkhada , Tokyo, Japan
