I have not been able to understand why the dispute between those who should and should not have a cable car to go to Pathibhara Mata Temple in Taplejung has not been resolved yet?

What is the reason for not leaving the cable car in Pathibhara? There is no unnecessary controversy on this matter. Why did they do it for the commission? What is the point of disputing that the cable car should be kept repeatedly after the residents protest that the cable car cannot be kept? Why would the state have done something to anger the residents of Taplejung who were living peacefully? The government should stop creating disputes between the police and the residents. It doesn't solve the problem. Due to the dispute, a situation of clashes has been created many times. In the clashes that took place on Saturday, 24 people were injured and 15 people were arrested. This is not good.

The District Administration Office has implemented a prohibition order. This has made life difficult there. The government should resolve the cable car dispute. It is said that democracy has come to the country, but the state has not stopped oppressing the people. After saying 'no cable car' it was over. Why unnecessary controversy? Taking a cable car to go to Pathibhara Mata temple will be easier. By saying that, there is no way to take away the jobs there. The government is unable to provide employment, and there is no way to destroy the working environment for those who work. A cable car is installed to go to every monastery. That is not being done by the state, but by the private sector. The private sector takes money as it pleases, the state does not monitor it. If cable cars are to be installed in such monasteries, the state should not install them on its own.

– Purushottam Ghimire , Jorpati, Kathmandu