It is a bitter truth that the existing parties in Nepal are running on the basis of factions and sub-factions instead of following the political mainstream as a whole. The people have realized that factional politics and factional politics are not assimilating the meaning and spirit of the country's constitution.

This is the main question and concern of the people today. Now the people are not looking for an alternative to the existing political system. But they are waiting for a political leadership that will work for the country and the people. The alternative can be the person who played the role of guardian of the country yesterday or the person who is sitting in an honorable position or any other qualified person.

UML deputy general secretary Pradeep Gyawali was heard to express that it is not appropriate for the former president, who has become the father of the country, to be active in politics. The expression that it is not appropriate for the central president of UML to drag the former president into politics has also come out through the media. In this way, it is not difficult to understand that it is a faction of a political party to express publicly in such a way that the rights of sovereign citizens are suppressed. After having been in politics for a long time and successfully fulfilling the responsibilities gained by doing politics, whether or not to be active in politics again after exiting is a completely private matter of the individual. Individuals rise and fall in factional politics. Such issues may have given stress to those who are doing their own and factional politics without doing the politics of the country and the people as a whole.

If the politicians want to assimilate the people's wishes, they should come back to the people, not for the sake of their honor, but for the honor and reputation of the country and the people, even if it is after drinking Kalkut poison. Let us say that the political philosophy or political theory embraced by the UML is multi-party democracy of the people. Its pioneer is Madan Bhandari, then General Secretary of UML. Today, the principle of multi-party democracy of the people is becoming unclear. In this context, what difference did it make when former President Bidya Devi Bhandari came to hold the political legacy of her late husband by leading the entire left movement and establishing herself as a politician instead of leading a faction in the UML? It will be a moment of joy for the country and the people. People are ready to welcome him in a pure and emotional manner from the conscience, not by offering food, garlands, red carpet.
– Deepak Kumar Gyawali , Kusumkhola, Palpa

It is good for any person or group with special qualifications to start a party or enter politics with a specific purpose. For the citizens of a country like ours, which is shaken due to disorder, it can be something that inspires more hope. Some people or groups are taking advantage of that doubt. But what happened here is that the piles of needs and desires of the citizens are piled up, no one is trying to solve them. Every day speeches are made in the name of the people, but the people's signature is not attached to the work they do.
In this messo, people who have been the head of the state, the deputy head are talking about returning to active politics. This is very exciting for common people. One who has no special ability, no purpose, only hunger for power. Even though it is figurative, while playing the role of the guardian of the entire country, he has no memorable work except helping those who are said to be indulging in power interests. What will be achieved by 'out dated' returning to politics? There is no point in discussing those who have been lost in history. Even the media workers have not been able to figure out what to give importance to and what to ignore!
– Ratna Prasad Luintel , Paachkhaal-10, Kavrepalanchok