Disagreements and disagreements can occur within any party. All leaders and workers have the right to have opinions and opinions. That is called democracy.

Why say that democracy has come if you can't speak and write freely in a constitutional framework? Why is there a crisis of democracy in UML, a party trusted by the people? It is not a big deal that UML expelled Bhim Rawal, Madhav Nepal, Ghanshyam Bhusal from the party, what is important is how it affects the political situation of the country. In a country like America, there are two main parties, but in our country, there are 121 parties registered with the Election Commission. Why did the hype to open the party like this? The reason for this is the style of action shown by the UML president. Madhav Nepal, Jhalnath Khanal, who were dissatisfied, opened the Unified Samajwadi Party. After taking action against Bhim Rawal, he is already preparing to start another party.

What the leadership decided in UML, if no one can speak about it, then it would be a dictator. Do the people now have to understand that there is a dictatorship within the UML? Shekhar Koirala, Bimalendra Nidhi, Prakashman Singh, Sher Bahadur Deuba of Congress contested for the chairmanship. Deuba did not take action against them. Their position in the party is still respected. However, the style of leadership in UML seems to be more autocratic. Yesterday, Madhav Nepal, Ghanshyam Bhusal and others were punished by not even being ordinary members of the
party. Now Bhim Rawal has fallen under the wrath of Oli. It is wrong to try to destroy the entire political future of a person who has been in politics for three decades. The leadership could not understand the contribution he made for the party. How long will the UML party president shut his mouth? Who will be prosecuted for how long? It weakens the party itself. The impression that UML is the only party of KP Oli has fallen into the public mind.

– Purushottam Ghimire , Jorpati, Kathmandu