CPN-UML and KP Sharma Oli have become synonymous since he came to the leadership of the party. After UML's former leaders Madhav Kumar Nepal and Jhalnath Khanal abandoned UML in August 2078, it was as if a bone stuck in Oli's neck had been removed and it became easy for him to establish his single supremacy in the party.

If you fully support him, do it, otherwise, whoever stands against him has no place in the party, Oli said. He has been following the policy of killing those who oppose him in the party. Although there is a multi-membership practice in the party, in practice, the party is run by a single decision. Although there is dissatisfaction in some matters within the UML, no one has seen any other option than to remain silent because of the leadership style.

Oli's attack on leaders like Bhim Rawal is too late. Because Rawal is one of the leaders who promoted Madhav Nepal and Jhalnath Khanal, who were then in the UML, to fight against Oli. When the party broke up and did not support it, he sat helplessly in Oli's shadow. In Nepal at that time, after the Khanals left the party, Rawal may have thought that he would win under the leadership of UML. But not only to take the leadership in the 10th congress of the party, but also to run for the post of president, he had to get a lot of papad. As much as Oli has increased single rule in the party, it has also been proven that the party is decaying. Characters like Binda Pandey and Ushakiran Timsena have become role models for those who were forced to stay lost in UML due to

leadership. After Min Bahadur Gurung raised a loud voice from inside and outside the party regarding the fact that Min Bahadur Gurung would donate land to build the office, the matter reached the Supreme Court. Finally, after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the UML party, Oli has started to monopolize the party even more. After all, Oli, who interprets himself as a leader who fought against panchayats, now imposes the same panchayat regime on the party, what will be the result in the future?
– Sujan Devkota , Palungtar-4, Gorkha

UML had no place even for a leader with a strong nationalist and honest image like Bhim Rawal. The expulsion of Rawal and the suspension of Binda Pandey have sent a message that there is no place for self-criticism in the UML as long as KP Oli is there. In the past, Bhim Rawal, Ghanshyam Bhusal and other '10 brothers' had opposed Oli's working style, and they had started to follow him since then. This style of Oli shows that there is no internal democracy in UML at all. Oli has made it clear that he wants to model UML on the model of the Chinese Communist Party.
– Gopal Devkota , Jorpati, Kathmandu

UML has killed internal democracy within the party by expelling leaders like Bhim Rawal from ordinary membership. This incident makes it clear that UML is no longer a party based on ideas and principles, but on the basis of individualism, factionalism and authoritarianism. Expulsion of an efficient, nationalist and struggling leader like Bhim Rawal is the bare form of Oli tendency, who cannot face criticism, competition and truth. This style of suppressing dissenting voices within the party has turned UML from a revolutionary party into an authoritarian party. Bhim Rawal is not an ordinary leader, he is a leader who fights for the people, takes a stand for national pride and tries to purify the communist movement. But Oli tendency considered this ability as a threat and expelled him from the party. This move is not only a blow to Rawal, but to the entire nationalist leadership and ideas. Oli's selfish politics and authoritarian tendencies have now completely destroyed the critical and competitive environment within the party. The authoritarian style of Oli's leadership has moved the party away from the democratic structure based on ideas and principles.
– Santosh Simkhada , Tokyo, Japan

Bhim Rawal is not a particularly suitable character, as he is being talked about. Less realistic and more stunts. He also praises Oli for talking nonsense. While saying this, I do not mean to say that the action taken against him was justified. Oli needed Rawal's warning to walk on the right path himself. Oli has the illusion that he is a theologian, not only that he has no mistake anywhere and that he does not have the ability to make mistakes. This thinking of his is completely hindering the progress of the party. Let the impact of the rise or fall of his party on the country remain in the womb of time. The matter is not limited to this. The then Prime Minister Oli and Foreign Minister Pradeep Gyawali were in favor of passing the MCC project and that was absolutely justified. But on the basis of the Hawadari argument, under the illusion that he was no equal nationalist, Rawal played a role in passing the line that the MCC project should not be allowed to be passed at any cost along with Jhalnath Khanal. The role played by Prachanda, Madhav Nepal, Jhalnath Khanal with the aim of weakening Oli, especially by making MCC a star, became the main reason for the collapse of unity and the collapse of the government.
– Ratna Prasad Luintel , Panchkhal-10, Kavre