The harsh reality that Bajura had to face

Poush 9, 2081

Pathak Patra

The harsh reality that Bajura had to face

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

The news published in Kantipur on 6th of January titled 'Delegation to move unused Beilibridge for two years' has exposed the harsh reality faced by the remote district of Bajura. I first visited Bajura 47 years ago as a Peace Corps volunteer and recently returned.

I have a deep understanding of the courage and suffering of the people of this region as well as the challenges they face in their daily lives. Last fall I visited Bajura. During this, the local residents openly expressed their complaints about the government's policy of 'out of sight, out of mind'. This sentiment echoes the story of the disused belay bridge on the Budhiganga river, which if moved across the Dansanghu river in Kolti, could transform the lives of thousands of people.

For two years, local leaders have been working hard for its relocation, which would have provided road facilities to the residents of 17 municipalities in Bajura, Kalikot, Humla and Mugu. However, the process has not progressed due to government slowness. Lack of road access increases the cost of basic materials, limiting economic opportunity.

Most tragically, it delays emergency health care, which can sometimes lead to death. The residents of Bajura do not need luxury, they need infrastructure that can radically improve their lives. Local representatives have done things like organizing meetings, passing resolutions and lobbying at the state and federal levels, but their efforts have been frustrated by the inaction of higher authorities. It shows that the voices of remote areas are drowned in the noise of urban priorities.

I request the union and state government to understand the seriousness of this problem. Moving the baileybridge doesn't have to take years of repeated meetings and persuasive requests. Beyond the technicalities, this is an opportunity for the government to rebuild trust with remote residents. Taking swift and decisive action in this Ballybridge can send a strong message that no region is remote, no community is small. Don't let Ballybridge become another symbol of broken promises. 

Jim O'Reilly

Pathak

Link copied successfully