We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
For a few years now, there have been rumblings of raising the retirement age of employees from 58 to 60 years. In today's technology era, blocking the entry of new employees who are enthusiastic, energetic and accustomed to technology is only a way to further weaken the government's efficiency and push the country backward. The government's priority should be an energetic and result-oriented personnel system rather than just financial profit and loss.
Increasing the retirement age by imitating developed countries is like giving the same medicine for different diseases. Because the problems, priorities and needs of those countries were different. Instead, if the retirement age can be maintained at 55 years, retired employees can contribute more to the state by starting some new ventures and creating new jobs.
In addition, in a country like ours, which is wrapped in unemployment, energetic manpower also gets an opportunity to serve the nation. Therefore, if the retirement age can be reduced to 55 years, it will be beneficial for both the state and the employees. Let the law makers pay attention to this.
– Sanjay Adhikari, Kathmandu
