Let's focus on the schooling period, not the cooling of employees

The subject of 'cooling off period' is not a subject related to the government's policy and the enhancement of service quality and promotion of professionalism.

Shrawn 23, 2082

Rajendra Singh Bhandari

Let's focus on the schooling period, not the cooling of employees

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

At present, many debates, concerns and concerns have surfaced regarding the legal provision of 'cooling period' for the purpose of applying to the retirement of employees. It seems that the Parliamentary Inquiry Committee has constituted and submitted a report to find out the truth about the matter, as the debate on the issue of whether or not the employee who never cooled down during his public service career, who was always stuck in the government room due to political pressure and influence, should be put in a 'cooling period' or not, has taken the form of a conspiracy and manipulation.

These tricks and conspiracies have turned into serious criminal cases against the state, such as forgery, forgery, and other violations of existing laws. In such a situation, if the report of the parliamentary inquiry is accepted as a criminal report, i.e. a complaint, and the said inquiry report is sent to the Central Investigation Bureau of the Police for police investigation and investigation, all the facts and details of the incident can be confirmed and resolved legally. If not, it seems that another possible trick will be to make the subject of legal investigation a subject of investigation and end the criminal act as an impunity, as in the past, on the basis of political interests and power.

In fact, this suggestion, which is suggested to solve the suspicion that most of the employees who have spent their working life in a civilized manner by holding their official dignity and status hostage to private interests and the suspicion that they will be eager for other government opportunities immediately after service and because of this reason, it does not seem to solve the issue permanently and long-term. 

This issue has become complicated due to one type of employee who cannot celebrate and adopt retired life as enthusiasm and celebration, and another type of employee who does not hesitate to do fraud, conspiracy and lobbying to the extent of cheating, conspiracy and lobbying for the extinction of the possible danger that may occur in the 'cooling period' for the protection of past shortcomings and unrelated misdeeds. 

After the service period, if the greed can be determined now, the employees who are under the understanding that they can indulge in greed and lust, have not done much concrete and multi-purpose work during their service period. Employees who want to achieve their positional greed and lust as an integral part of life till death, need to be kept not only in cooling but also in schooling period. 

The issue of 'cooling off period' has come into discussion unnecessarily due to the government's thinking that if the employees are not kept in the 'cooling period', they will become greedy and the outgoing will have adverse effects on the current official responsibilities and the narrow thinking of the employees who manipulate the legal provisions in order to protect the future official opportunities in any way. This is not a matter related to the improvement of the quality of the government's policies and services and the promotion of professionalism. 

Birth, life, job and responsibility have their own nature, culture and method. Birth is coincidental, life is utilitarian, job is emotional and responsibility is fearless in nature, but without imbibing this eternal truth, it is necessary to apply schooling periods at different stages of the job to improve the tendency of the employees who try to keep the opportunistic life intact with their thoughts, concerns and thoughts intact. 

Because instead of sharpening and training the employees, only unnecessary and faith-based work was done, even in the democratic system, there could not be a permanent government, that is, the quality and capacity development of the employees. It seems that the issue of quality enhancement has become more difficult and difficult after starting to send their own clan or uncool even to administrative training institutes.

Most of our high-ranking employees tend to be dependent due to not being able to combine the issues of character development and capacity building after the appointment of employees. The pain and irony of our employees, who have to be focused even for the jurisdiction of their own moral development and service flow, is also interesting. Government employees have lost their original ability and identity because they have become accustomed to the gaze-oriented job style. 

In this way, it is necessary to implement a plan and strategy on how to develop employees who are always irritated but not irritated rather than keeping them in a period of more irritation. For this, there is an urgent need to improve policy and legal measures. For example, it has become necessary to legally ban employees' associations, organizations, councils, etc., which are opened by dividing employees under party cover. When national service employees are joined to the union organization of the constitution and flag, their mindset will be focused on the service of ideas and faith rather than service and personal opportunities will be obtained in a protected manner rather than professional ability. 

confirms their political involvement even from the events that were 'penned down' in the past movement, disobeyed the government's policy, so employees are not allowed to open class unions-organizations as political beliefs. Likewise, there is a need to comprehensively improve and revise the criteria for the appointment of various government services, including various constitutional commissions. For appointment, the 'criteria' such as reaching the age of 45 years and having work experience of this period are now considered as 'outdated criteria'. 

Because of the mythic thinking of linking qualification with age experience, new and hot energy was legally prohibited in important responsibilities for which the 'criteria' was made in the constitution, they opposed the 'cooling of period', so service opportunities should not be narrowed down because of age and experience. 

Keeping the employees who were brought up in the wrong schooling and putting them all in a 'cooling off period' is not a scientific and long-term useful solution, even if someone explains it in a positive way as an effort to make them feel responsible for the moment. As long as the government itself does not adopt the professional skills and qualifications of the employees as a basic condition for the upliftment and prosperity of the nation, then the issue of employee capacity development will not be a priority of the government. Until the 'cooling period' is replaced by a 'schooling period', this issue cannot be reasonably concluded.

Rajendra

Link copied successfully