Tribhuvan University, which is the largest and has the largest number of students in the country, is currently becoming a target of student organizations. The university has become a place for student organizations, professors and staff to protest. Whether it is the appointment of officials or the appointment of employees, this university is becoming the area of ​​self-fulfillment of various associations.

There is no doubt that the university has the responsibility of shaping the future of students from undergraduate to postgraduate level. But at this time, it is a matter of concern that this university is being targeted by the student union-organization of the ruling party. If we look at the latest developments, from the leaders of the student union-organizations to the workers of the ruling party, they are continuing to vandalize and arson the university. 

The meeting of the Executive Council of the University is held from time to time, the meeting also recommends action to the people involved, but these voices are suppressed based on political access. Why is this always the case? At this time, this has become the subject of interest of all stakeholders. 

Why did the university become confused and problematic? Shouldn't it be answered by the concerned party? Months have passed since the resignation of the Vice-Chancellor of the Tertiary University, who single-handedly carried 80 percent of the burden of higher education, who gained national and international attention. Although late, the government has formed a three-member recommendation committee under the chairmanship of the education minister for the appointment of the vice-chancellor. It has been a long time since I worked as Vice-Chancellor and Head of Education in such a big university. 

Even though the vice-chancellor and other officials have not been appointed, the academic world has become surprised by the silence of the government side, the academic world, the faculty organization and the student organization. Why does the state not try and take initiatives to save the dignity of an institution like Trivi?

80 percent of private educational institutions across the country are affiliated with university professors. Running a private educational institution from a completely profitable and commercial point of view on the initiative and effort of a person who is making a high-level competent policy for the overall development of the country is not an attack on the desire of the children of the working class and the proletariat to have accessible and quality higher education? It should be answered by academic and tertiary teachers or not?

The answer should be found by student organizations or not?

It is a good thing in itself to open an educational institution like Trivi in ​​the country. But in the name of the institution, education beyond the reach of the general public is conducted as a source of income, if respected academic figures, student organizations and related parties question whether or not?

Cultivating business in private educational institutions by selling university logos, not going to the campus even if the sun is shining, arriving 10 minutes late, leaving the classroom 10 minutes before the deadline, taking study leave to teach tuition coaching, playing politics in the name of professors, selling university logos and adorning private educational institutions in advertisements.

All the stakeholders say that the University has reached this situation due to the Kalidas tendency of the academic personalities of the University who are successful in creating high level manpower. Should the interested parties question that those who take all the facilities available in the university and eat the salary without teaching properly, but advertise the colleges opened with their own investment rather than for the benefit of the university, and those who call themselves academics of the university are trying to destroy the academic environment of the university's reputation, pride and structure?

Neither the state nor the academics are interested in the fact that no official has been appointed in the University. Neither the political party nor the student organization is concerned about this. By undermining the reputation and dignity of the university, the merchants of educational commercialization are making media claims that now the university is dead, it has no future. They are combining profit and loss. And what can be said without irony to stand up in the ranks of high-level academics and become partners of the political party leaders?

Kurlin is not behind in insisting that the university should be kept free from political interference. At this time, it can be easily assumed that the university is becoming the center of strike, lockout, due to the power of the ruling party. What is the world saying to an institution as sensitive as a university and which is the backbone of the nation's development if the police are deployed in the central office every day? Ruining the future of millions of students for the academic sector cannot be considered good under any pretext. 

It is not appropriate to say that the logo of some subjects in the university will be lost and the student attraction will decrease in some subjects. It's the same university, why is there attraction in some subject and repulsion in some subject? Do you have to answer that? Naturally, the academic field must be free from political interference. Academic venues should not be made playgrounds for political parties.