Commentaries continue to be formed and destroyed. If they wanted to preserve the unity of the left wing and the unity of the party in any way, then one president (Pushpakmal Dahal) would not have expelled the other president (KP Oli) from the party by unilaterally violating the written agreement of the two presidents to decide with the consent of the two presidents.

Journalist Sudhir Sharma, in his book 'Laboratory' published in 2070, has given an account of the role of Delhi, Durbar and Maoists in the transition of Nepal. At present, the riddle of Delhi is slowly coming to the surface, while the palace is searching for earthquakes from below the surface. The Maoists are in the race to surpass all others in making the country's politics a laboratory. Today's challenge of the Nepalese society has become a laboratory attitude. 

When will Nepali transition period come to an end, there is no address. In the 9 years since the new constitution was made, 7 governments have been formed. After the people's revolution of 062/063, 16 governments have been formed in 18 years. Except for one of those governments, none of them could see two years. Even though the character and the party are the same, the government has a tendency to change. Prolonged transition and lack of political stability have become the main obstacles to Nepali prosperity. The need today is to replace the narrative of

transition with the narrative of stability. In order to end the instability, there is a need for intensive debate about changes in the electoral system, work system or structural system. Without policy-based political stability, a full stop during the transition seems impossible. 

The fact that the country was in darkness during the 30-year Panchayat period from 2017 to 2046 was directly ruled by the king. Comparing the progress made by the world in the four decades from 1950 to 1990 and the dungeon that Nepal experienced at the same time, it is clear why Nepal is at the bottom. Even now, it seems that there is an attempt to make a country full of abundant power poor and bring those who are limited to skeletons back to power.

focuses on making commentary that nothing has happened in the last 30 years (multi-party and republican). Just as there is no possibility of a skeleton waking up and becoming a living person, there is no possibility of the monarchy returning to power in Nepal. 

After one communist party, UML, gained popularity with new standards by forming the first popularly elected communist government in 051, another communist, Maoist, started an armed war from 052. He said, 'A party without a revolutionary army is a party of the bourgeoisie. The Communist Party seizes power not through elections, but through weapons' etc.

The comment raised by the Maoist also made many people angry. After emerging as the winning power of the 062/063 revolution, the Maoists became rivals to the UML. Those two parties formed the CPN by forming the Left Alliance in the 074 election and the party unity in 075. It didn't even last two years but their collaboration didn't stop even then. 

commentaries continue to be made and broken. If they wanted to preserve the unity of the left wing and the unity of the party in any way, then one president (Pushpakmal Dahal) would not have expelled the other president (KP Oli) from the party by unilaterally violating the written agreement of the two presidents to decide with the consent of the two presidents. What is the bitter truth, when the government is in power, the commentary of communist unity remains dormant, but after leaving the government, the work is still going on. 

Now populist commentary is making many excited. Their mission is to dramatize existing problems. Commenting that the old cannot do it anymore, the new is needed. Now they are trying to make such a commentary in the name of Ravi, Hark and Balen. The commentary that Naya is trying to make, 'choosing those who know', has already started circulating in courts, streets and social networks, which will later become a trap for themselves. It won't take long to establish that populists are good at raising problems but failing to provide solutions. 

It cannot be said that the country has not achieved anything despite the darkness, continuous transition period, political instability, and geopolitical challenges experienced until the end of the twentieth century. A lot of game changer concepts like petroleum pipeline, load shedding free country, tunnel, Kathmandu-Tarai Expressway, east-west and north-south rail potential and Sunkoshi-Marin diversion project are coming to fruition.

is trying to forcefully establish the comment that everyone is the same, the country is not becoming, which is not true. Such negative comments have helped to create a mentality that especially the new generation cannot do anything by staying in the country. Those who seek to flood the mass of negativity, increase frustration among the people and create social chaos by driving the society into a quagmire of anarchy are gaining ground. 

There is a need for debate about the country's identity and strength from a new angle to move Nepal's politics on the path of stability by tearing apart the false commentary that is imported, sponsored, anarchy-inducing and beggars of negativity. There is a need for a planned initiative, especially to develop a lively relationship between the state and the citizens, to guide the politics based on the policy and basically to gather and inform the general public about the policy of protecting the country's independence, self-respect and national interests.