The government is dead, we are in trouble.'' However, within this expression, the character of a person, political culture and the future of those who claim to represent alternative ideas have also been revealed.

It seems that the Honorable Court has issued an arrest warrant in the initial evaluation of the facts and evidence submitted regarding the involvement of RSWP Chairman Ravi Lamichhane in the co-operative fraud. This is a common but common judicial process in the criminal justice system. Lamichhane's expression of 'the government is dead and in limbo', which was made public after the arrest warrant was issued, was definitely not a result of impulse, excitement and spontaneity. In fact, leprosy belongs to the one who eats leprosy. If you don't pay attention to what to eat, with whom to eat and how to eat, you will have to take care of it.

The trend of seeing the government alive even a few moments before issuing the arrest warrant, seeing them as great leaders when they were in the government, suddenly seeing the government dead has exposed the sick picture of our political culture and the practice of democracy. There has been a concerted effort to hide and destroy evidence. An unsuccessful attempt has also been made to suppress the complaints filed by the government itself. After the attempt to make themselves clear, even if only momentarily, through the abuse of state power, they are now trying to divert the legal police investigation process. It is illegal and deplorable to try to cover up your criminal activities through street resistance by using fraud cases as state retribution. 

In a country like ours, the effect of the incident of state retaliation is on the police investigation. In theory and legally, the state is fair and public-welfare, but in practice, the trend of mobilizing state agencies in a way to protect, clean up, and retaliate against the opposition under the guise of state power is old. In the practice of putting those who show readiness to do such things in the important responsibility of the state's leading agencies, no matter how much they criticize the role of the old leaders, the trend of finding a way out of their criminal acts according to the strategy of political resistance within this scandal seems even more dangerous. The political character and behavior adopted by the power that sees its political future in the disgust of the common people who are disgusted by the misrule in the country and the main character of its mother, has started to appear in a more frightening way. 

In the recent past, the events in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh are seen as a necessary and necessary event for change, so the issue raised by the powers that be has become selfish and has blocked the path of sudden change that can come through agitation and rebellion. As natural and effective as the power of citizens to organize spontaneously is, in the same way, a demonstration aimed at unfairly influencing the release of a particular person or a formal investigation cannot become participatory. Eventually the performance itself turns into a farce. After the fundamental content of the movement has become contaminated and individual-centered, the alternative power and ideas that are under construction against the old evils of the state have become weak. 

Those who look at the investigation against Lamichhane, who is accused of co-operative fraud, from the lens of state revenge, have devalued even the circumstantial evidence with prejudice. In addition, it seems that such activities are trying to suppress the right of cooperative victims to get justice in a legal manner. If you look closely at the street demonstrations against the co-op victims and the mannerisms, clothes, and clothes of the people present in that demonstration, most of the demonstrators seem to represent the upper class, the upper class, and the elite. However, the co-operative victims who protested with empty plates are worried and wandering in search of justice.

In such a situation, in the shadow of resistance and revenge, the issue of victim or perpetrator seems to be in dilemma. When it is not clear whether the street is the victim or the perpetrator, the fact that the street will take the form of a movement like in Sri Lanka or Bangladesh can be nothing but a momentary daydream for those who do not understand the psychology of the crowd.

The demands of vulnerable groups who have not received payment for milk and sugarcane, who are in the clutches of meter interest, who are trapped in the cycle of microfinance interest, are meaningless when the national demands and issues are not being made. . It is futile to dare to bake the bread of self-interest in the fire of the same rebellion. Therefore, rather than looking at the police investigation with contaminated eyes, it should be assisted in the investigative process. It seems necessary to make the issue that everyone involved in incidents of the same nature should be punished in the same way, that all the co-op victims get justice and get their money back and that the perpetrators get punished.