We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
The Abuse of Authority Investigation Commission has filed a case against the director of various advertising agencies including the then chief administrative officer for publishing advertisements for various construction contracts of Tilathi Koiladi Rural Municipality.
In the fiscal year 2079/80 of the village council, the notice of four bids and the notice of purchase intention had to be published in a national level daily newspaper according to the Public Procurement Act. The Commission alleges that only one copy of the notice of intention to accept the bid was published without publishing it publicly with the intention of hiding the notice of invitation to tender.
The Commission has claimed a demand equal to 3 lakh 16 thousand 400 against Surendra Kumar Yadav, the then Chief Administrative Officer of the Village, Assistant Accountant Shatrohan Das, Bhushan Kumar Singh, founder of Times Republic Media, Ravi Aryal, Director of Dutch Media, Krishna Bahadur Karki of Prabhav Dainik. According to the commission, according to the letter dated 23rd Chait 23 of 2079 by the Press Council of Nepal, it has been found that the notice of the tender has not been published.
It has been seen that the notice of intent to purchase has not been publicly published for distribution purposes. The Commission is of the opinion that no information has been published even in the PDF archive of the newspaper management system. The Commission alleges that only one copy of the tender notice was published in Sourya Daily, it was not even mentioned in the details submitted to the Press Council, and it was not even found in the PDF. The Commission is of the opinion that
has been found to be defamatory by publishing one copy without distributing it publicly. Commission spokesman Rajendra Kumar Paudel informed that a case has been filed in the special court on Tuesday with a demand for imprisonment and extra charge against five people.
