The issue of private school and Early Childhood Development Class (ECD) operation will now be discussed in the committee
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
The parliamentary sub-committee has submitted a report to the Education, Health and Technology Committee of the House of Representatives after considering two controversial issues. On Sunday, the sub-committee chaired by UML MP Chavi Lal Vishwakarma submitted a report to the committee.
Coordinator Bishwakarma submitted the report to the chairman of the committee, Ammar Bahadur Thapa. The sub-committee could not agree on the operation of private schools and early childhood development classes (ECD). Coordinator Vishwakarma also said that these issues will be discussed in the committee.
It has been agreed that there will be no SEE exam, no district education office, 60 percent of teachers will be appointed from internal competition and 40 percent will be appointed from open competition, principals will be appointed through competition from the state and private schools will be regulated on scholarships. Similarly, it has been decided that the transfer of teachers will be done only in 5 to 7 years, there will be 2 special categories of teachers in each province, the status of school employees will be maintained and the periodic promotion of teachers will be ensured.
The committee formed an 11-member sub-committee on March 8 under the coordination of MP Chabilal Vishwakarma to discuss the school education bill quickly. The sub-committee started weekly discussions from 18 March. In the
bill, it is mentioned that private schools should be operated under the company model in the current state. The ruling and competing MPs who amended the bill have been saying that it should be taken to a non-profit model (guthi) after setting a certain period. MPs participating in the discussion say that the government has not come up with a clear opinion on this matter and there is a difference of opinion among the MPs on how many years it will be taken to Guthi.
