We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
A corruption case has been filed against Amin Dinesh Prasad Yadav of the Kathmandu Valley Development Authority, claiming a sum of Rs.
The Abuse of Authority Investigation Commission filed a case in a special court on Monday against Amin Yadav, who is working on a contract in Gaurighat under the Bagmati Nagar Land Consolidation Project run by the Valley Development Authority, District Commissioner's Office, Kathmandu, and charged Rs. According to the authority, a case has been filed with the demand of fine and imprisonment as per the law after the investigation confirmed that Yadav had acquired illegal wealth by misusing the position of
. Against him, the authority had brought the movable property acquired during the period from August 8, 2063 to June 30, 2081 under the scope of investigation. The source of undisclosed property has been confiscated by the authority.
During that period, Yadav's legitimate income was 20 million rupees 242 million 20 thousand 301 rupees 30 paisa and 3 million 29 million rupees 45 thousand 702 rupees 21 million rupees and it has been confirmed that he acquired wealth illegally.
The authority has taken a demand to confiscate the property of the same amount as it is an offense under subsection (1) of section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 2059 by acquiring illegal property. The authority has also claimed to keep the assets that have been increased from illegal assets.
It has been found that Yadav earned illegally while holding public office and kept the property in the name of his wife Amrutakumari Yadav. The authority has filed a case against Amrita Kumari by making her a defendant for the purpose of confiscating the illegal assets in her name. It is also mentioned in the charge sheet filed by the authority that Yadav made illegal income from transactions including bribery while in office.
