38 lakh 80 thousand extorted to pass the MBBS entrance exam, after the name was not revealed, the victim was threatened with a loan of 5 million
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
It has been revealed that Anil Kumar Pokharel, the personal secretary of the Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee of the House of Representatives, Rishikesh Pokharel and UML Morang District Committee member, has defrauded Rs 38 lakh 80 thousand by claiming that he would pass the MBBS entrance examination.
Under the pressure of power and power, the District Police Office and the District Attorney's Office Morang were protecting Anil, but the High Court has ordered to file a complaint against Anil.
It is alleged that between 2071 and 2073, Anil repeatedly took 38 lakh 80 thousand from Boualal Choudhary of Saptari by promising to pass the MBBS entrance exam and to create an atmosphere to keep her in the hostel.
Boualal said that after his name did not come out in MBBS, he was threatened on the contrary when he asked for the money back. When he filed a complaint with the police, it was not registered, nor was there any help from the District Attorney's Office for filing the complaint. After that, Boualal went to the Biratnagar High Court seeking an order to register a complaint. The fraud allegations were made public only after the High Court gave a mandate on December 11.
Baualal of Agnisair Krishnaswaran Rural Municipality-5 Bakdhuwa of Saptari gave 50 thousand rupees to Anil through his friend Kedar Prasad Ghimire on February 13, 2071 and later deposited 1 lakh rupees through Ramdev Singh in Anil's account number 3510017503981 in Nabil Bank. 130,000 was deposited in the same account of Nabil Bank on May 13, 2073. On November 22, 2073, Boualal deposited a lump sum of 18 lakh rupees.
"I have repeatedly paid 38 lakh 80 thousand rupees," Boualal told Kantipur on the phone, "Anil has eaten all the money I have earned throughout my life." Boualal, who was waiting for his daughter's name to come out in the MBBS entrance exam, was disappointed when he did not contact her. "When they were in contact, sometimes they would say that they had reached Australia, sometimes they would say that they had reached Canada," Boualal said, "At that time, I and my family were under stress." Another time, he promised to return his one crore rupees from Canada and as soon as it arrived.
Boualal said that once he tried to give a check to a bank account that had no money, but he refused to understand. The next time he went abroad to participate in the conference through the cooperative and said that he would return the money as soon as he returned. In the meantime, Boualal had submitted a petition with attention to Anil's fraud business in UML's district convention in Morang. But Boualal did not get support from UML, while Anil got protection.
Boualal says that Anil called him saying that he will pay the account on July 9, 2079. "A group of 8-10 people called me to pay off your account and forced me to sign a document of 50 lakh rupees dated Sunday, 25th June 2074," he stated in the petition in the court.
Boualal Chowdhury's voucher depositing money in Anil Kumar Pokharel's bank account.
After that, Boualal went to the area police office Rangeli demanding to cancel the loan deed of 50 lakhs and return his 38 lakhs 80 thousand and to take legal action against Anil. The police refused to register a complaint. After that, he went to Morang district police office, but no complaint was registered there either.
Even after reaching the Boualal district public prosecutor's office, the police were not ordered to register a complaint. Boualal sent the complaint to the police on July 18, 2079. After the police received the letter from the post office, they did not proceed with the investigation into the fraud. After that, Boualal approached the High Court to issue a warrant in the name of the police and the lawyer's office to investigate the fraud against Anil.
The bench of High Court Judges Rajyalakshmi Vajracharya and Suryanath Prakash Adhikari filed a complaint against Anil last week and ordered the District Police Office Morang to investigate according to law. The police claimed in the court that Boualal had not filed a complaint and that no complaint had been filed even from the post office. The High Court showed the evidence of Boualal's complaint to the police in the court itself.
'It appears from the postman's book received from the Directorate of Posts Biratnagar that the letter of registry number 'RD780470582NP' sent by this petitioner to District Police Office Morang through post on July 18, 2079, on July 19, 2079, was received by District Police Office Morang. The court said in the mandate.
It is written in the mandate that the answer of District Police Office Morang cannot be considered reasonable. Based on the information received, the High Court has asked the police to act according to the law, saying that it is not possible to live without completing the procedure prescribed by law.
'There is no basis and reason why the complaint of the petitioner should not be registered and the investigation should not be conducted as the petitioner's complaint has not been received. In the case of not carrying out the legal duty or refusing to do it or delaying it, the remedy of injunction is necessary against the related public official or office to perform the act, to cause or to cause the legal duty to be performed,' it is said in the injunction.
Boualal, a retired senior agricultural extension officer, met Anil through a friend in 2071. During the course of acquaintance, Boualal easily believed when Anil told him that he had political access 'to the top'. At that time, the daughter had completed SLC. Boualal asked Anil's help to fulfill his daughter's dream of studying medicine. After that Anil told Boualal that "I will get the name taken out but for that I have to spend a lot of money".
Boualal said that he has hope to get justice after the court order. I am a person who is tired of many places and people. The court has ordered, now I want my money back,' he said.
The question of how to investigate Anil, who has access to the Center politically, has also been raised. He is affiliated with the UML, which is the government at the center and in the state. Hrishikesh Pokharel, who made Anil his personal secretary, has also been protecting his wife accused of co-operative fraud for political access. Rishikesh's wife Anjala Koirala has been absconding since the arrest warrant was issued by the district court in the Uma-Gauri cooperative fraud.
Public Accounts Committee Chairman Rishikesh Pokharel has suddenly removed Anil as his personal secretary after the news about the fraud was published. While the court issued an order on this matter on December 11.
The letter that he removed the personal secretary reached the Federal Parliament Secretariat on Friday morning. In the letter written by Chairman Pokharel to the Parliament Secretariat, it is said, "I have drawn serious attention to the news published in various media that Anil Kumar Pokharel, who is working as my personal secretary, has been issued an arrest warrant by the Morang High Court." With the aim of assisting in the investigation of the various charges against him, I request that he be expelled from the responsibility of my personal secretary with effect from today's date.'
Anil was recommended as a candidate for Koshi Pradesh Sabha from Morang-2 (2) in the 2079 election, but later Lilaballabh Adhikari got a ticket from that area. After not getting a ticket, Anil was made his personal secretary by Rishikesh.
When asked how the police will investigate Anil's fraud, SP Narayan Prasad Chimoria, head of the District Police Office, Morang, said that the order of the High Court has not been received. We learned about this from the media. We have not received the High Court order officially. Even the victim has not come in contact,' he said, 'after receiving the order of the court, the action will proceed according to the law.' .
