Vaidya's political student Pushpa Kamal Dahal has become Prime Minister three times through peaceful means. But the convention of Vaidya's party Revolutionary Communist Party has again passed the policy of public revolt.
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
The then Maoist vice-president Mohan Vaidya, who split from the Maoist center in June 2069 on the grounds of public rebellion, has been unanimously elected as the general secretary of the Revolutionary Communist Party. The convention that lasted for 10 days in Kathmandu elected 79-year-old Vaidya as the general secretary under a single leadership. There will be a permanent, politburo and central committee in his party, with no other office bearers.
The Congress has elected the Central Committee with 117 full members and 80 alternate members only last Monday . Vikram Samvat was born in Khaira, Pyuthan in 2003. Vaidya is also considered to be a lecturer in Marxism philosophy in Nepal.
He was not in any position of convenience while he was in Maoist power and power. While he was in Maoist, he did not leave the policy of people's rebellion and kept different opinions. He still kept the dream of public uprising alive. His political student, Pushpa Kamal Dahal, has become Prime Minister three times through a peaceful path. But Vaidya's party convention has again passed the policy of rebellion.
"We must proceed in the direction of continuous revolution under the leadership of the proletariat and the dictatorship of the proletariat in the middle of the people's struggle and the struggle of the people's resistance," said the document passed in the Congress of Vaidya, "in this way, we must proceed on the path of establishing a new democratic state power."
The senior leader of the Revolutionary Communist Party, CP Gajurel, said that the people's struggle will be carried forward with regard to the daily problems faced by the common people and it will gradually be turned into a rebellion.
'The direction of our party is to make people's struggle, people's movement and people's rebellion. We will fight peacefully at first, then we will move forward according to the behavior of the government," he said. He has also stated that he has taken the policy of people's revolt from the UML, Maoist center saying that socialist revolution is not possible.
'Classically brokers and bureaucratic capitalists and feudal state power and on the other hand politically they have been presenting themselves as supporters and defenders of the current parliamentary system and constitution,' Vaidya's analysis says, 'all of these recognize class syncretism, pluralism, abstractism and peaceful parliamentary competition. By adopting the backward classes, showing themselves as the real bearers of state power and order, the unequal and severe injustices imposed against the Nepali people and Nepal by imperialism/expansionism. They have surrendered to domestic and foreign reactionary forces by accepting various exploitation and oppression as they are and are emerging as neo-oligarchs and neo-reactionary forces.'
Vaidya mentioned that "Congress is the first among the parliamentary political parties". "Classically, the Nepali Congress represents the broker and bureaucratic capitalist and feudal class," the document says, "Ideologically and politically, it embraces pluralism, democratic socialism and parliamentary democracy." It considers itself to be the only messiah of parliamentary democracy. He has described the Congress as an 'old Raithane party that has been a supporter of parliamentary status quo'.
The UML and the Maoist center have been placed in the category of 'right-wing revisionist and parliamentary status quo parties'. "In Nepal, some political parties that hold right-wing revisionism on one hand and parliamentary status quoism on the other have continued to exist," Vaidya's analysis said, "These types of parties basically include CPN-UML, CPN-Maoist Center, Ekikat Samajwadi parties". All of them have called themselves the Communist Party.
Vaidya's analysis of the National Independent Party as "incompetent, failed and incapable of all the parliamentarian political parties" is that it is a parliamentarian party. "The old state power, presenting itself as the real supporter of the current constitution and parliamentary system, has come into existence with the belief that the situation should be changed, not the system," said Vaidya. He has also placed Netravikram Chand in the category of Maoist .
000
After becoming the first party in the first election of the Constituent Assembly of 2064, the Maoists were like other parties before 'Ratap'. That was the powerful president of the party, Pushpa Kamal Dahal . Despite getting a strong mandate on the basis of armed war, the Maoists were in a dilemma whether to adopt a policy of insurgency or a peaceful one. Dahal and the then Vice President Baburam Bhattarai were in favor of taking a peaceful path while Senior Vice President Mohan Vaidya was in the line of rebellion.
Vaidya, who was released from jail in India, was not satisfied that the party had come on a peaceful path. While he was in jail in India, President Dahal signed a detailed peace agreement with the then Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala on November 5, 2063. After the peace agreement with the government, Vaidya, who was released from India and returned home, was seeing the possibility of rebellion.
At the same time, in the extended meeting of Balaju in Kathmandu in July 2064, Mohan Vaidya gave a different opinion against Dahal, including "the course of action of public revolt". Vaidya, who is in the majority in the Central Committee, forced Dahal to bow down. Dahal also agreed with Vaidya's policy and agreed with the policy of public revolt. That extended meeting passed the policy of 'rebellion from the Constituent Assembly in the face of the people's constitution and internal strategy'.
Vaidya had a strong influence during his stay in the Maoist . At the Kharipati meeting in Bhaktapur in December 2065, the Vaidya party passed the then action plan to establish a people's republic through people's rebellion. At that time, Dahal reluctantly agreed to the policy of going from people's rebellion to people's democracy. The then Vice President Baburam Bhattarai disagreed with the policy of public uprising.
In November 2067, in an extended meeting of Maoists in Palungtar, Gorkha, vice presidents Vaidya and Bhattarai had written dissenting opinions against President Pushpa Kamal Dahal's proposal. In that meeting, the policy of Dahal and Vaidya was passed and it was decided to prepare the basis of rebellion.
But at that time Vaidya became dissatisfied as Dahal wanted to embrace a peaceful path. After the adjustment process of the fighters in 28 camps in different parts of the country, Vaidya concluded that the Maoists have moved on the path of 'self-surrender'. Continuing the struggle within the party, he revolted in June 2069 and formed a party named Revolutionary Maoist. After 11 years of separation from Maoist with the policy of people's rebellion, Vaidya has not left the policy of rebellion.
Vaidya has never owned the path taken by the Maoist Center at present. Although he was one of the strategists of the armed war, he always stood against the peaceful course of action .
Vaidya was arrested in Siliguri, India in March 2060 while the Maoists were at war. After Maoist came to peaceful politics, he was released in 2065 and returned to the country. But still he has not left the line of seizing state power by using force and making a new democratic revolution.
2042 After the split in CPN Mashal, CPN Mashal was formed under the leadership of Vaidya and CPN Masal was formed under the leadership of Mohan Vikram Singh. Moto Mashal was led by Vaidya, who passed the policy of armed people's war and started preparations. Under the leadership of Vaidya, in 2043, CPN Mashal attacked the police station of Kathmandu and put up posters. Sarka arrested dozens of workers of Mashal and severely tortured them. After Vaidya resigned as General Minister while taking responsibility for it, current Maoist Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal 'Prachanda' was elected as General Minister. After Dahal (Prachanda) was elected as the General Minister by the 2045 CPN Mashal conference, he has been leading the original party until now.
Under the leadership of Vaidya, in the year 2045, under his leadership, the first people's war training was held in Gorkha Siranchok. In 2045 Vaidya was preparing to launch a public war, so the public movement was postponed. After Vaidya Pakha, the 'People's War' started in 2052 under Dahal's leadership and lasted for 10 years.
While Vaidya was in jail in India, the Maoist meeting in October 2062 passed the guidelines for a competitive democratic republic.
Even though it has been 10 years since the country became a federal democratic republic, Vaidya still hasn't abandoned the policy of people's rebellion. Is that possible ? Vaidya concluded the conference and said that it was possible. "Revolutionary forces must continue to be united." "The revolution is not yet complete," he said, "people's power can be established through public revolt." That is possible.'
The senior leader of the Revolutionary Communist Party, CP Gajurel, has argued that the UML, the Maoist Center, and the Unified Socialist Right-Wing Party have gone to the path of the People's Uprising. They are the status quo right wing," he said, "we are revolutionaries. This is the big difference between him and us.' Although Dahal led the 'People's War' for 10 years, he argues that the right-wing has gone on the status quo path.
Left-wing analyst and Secretary of the Maoist Center Ram Karki said that Vaidya was an "honest" but fundamentalist leader who did not allow Marxism to budge even an inch. He emphasizes more on Marx's theory than on the originality of the country. Regardless of the state of the country, fanatics believe in Marxism, Leninism, and Maoism. He is an honest leader in his ideals, beliefs and principles," he said. Karki says that trying to modify Marxism is impure.' But because there is a dearth of revolutionary principles in the communist parties in Nepal, Vaidya can be a seed," he argues.
