A party is not just a top leader. It should be understood that the line of the next generation is also struggling within it. Hopeful faces should not be lumped together by being influenced by the misinformation that they are all bad.
Politics, also known as policy, is a platform for creating ideas that accelerate the country and society at large. Politics is so powerful that it can raise and lower the standard of living of the people. It can make or break the state of the country and society.
North Korea and Syria corrupted by autocratic politics, African countries unstable due to internal conflicts and our own country plagued by political instability are some examples. There are also countries that have developed political understanding, such as: America, Singapore, South Korea. How to make the country through politics depends on the party or leader who is leading the politics.
It is politics that makes the people aware of time and it is also politics that makes time according to people's wishes. After the Second World War, there was a wave of freedom in countries all over the world. Even though our neighboring country India got its independence from the centuries long colonialism, the then conscious youth jamaat did the work of making Nepal aware of the century long Jahanian Rana rule. Nepali people got a chance to experience all kinds of freedom, human rights and people's supremacy, which countries like France and America have accepted many years ago. In this sense, the seven-year revolution and the politics that led to it did the job of making the people aware of the time. The orderly continuation of the same time has reached the Federal Republic of Nepal today.
In a democratic system, everything has a choice. Citizen supremacy, availability of alternatives, rule of the majority and protection of the minority are what democracy is all about. Therefore, in a democracy, the people have the right to choose a political party to strengthen their ideas and strengthen them with institutional power. In Nepal today, there are open parties that give theoretical form to various ideas. There are many options open to parties to represent their views to the people. Can the mere availability of alternatives give a true sense of democracy? No progressive society seeks alternatives just for alternatives' sake. Looking for the best option to speed up the status quo. At present, alternative and alternative politics are very popular terms used in every public forum, chautari, tea shop, and social media in Nepal. It is necessary to look at current politics around these terms.
A party or movement that goes to the people with a roadmap for the next best system after concluding that the current system cannot speed up development and good governance can be called an alternative party in the right sense. Old parties can also be an option in this. After the movement of 2062/63, with the resolution to go to the republic, parties including the Congress gave an alternative path to politics. RPP is active in the agenda of restoring the monarchy even with the belief that the existing system cannot provide a solution. The so-called new parties looking for an alternative political space? It is important to understand that parties are not new or old just by looking at the year of establishment. The ideas adopted by any party, the tactics adopted and the leadership born on the basis of struggle, experience and merit from the party line will be 'new'.
How, in what sense, did the party that said that we are the alternative to all the old ones, and vowed to leave the old ones out of the political scene by saying 'No Not Again', enter the elections and use the parliamentary math they got for the transaction of state power, 'Again and Again', in what sense? If the identity of words and actions is not met, how did the younger party of the parliament differ from others? Can a party with morally questionable leadership and ambiguous policies become an alternative force just by accusing the established party? Shouldn't he give his roadmap? The established parties are not so weak because they are in a position to answer. How can anyone be a choice if people are confused for a while based on the density of the voice? A
team is an organization that combines ideas, policies, systems, and agendas. People are looking for a new face, which is true and natural too, as the old faces lead the government time and time again but fail to deliver well. The Nepalese people have given everyone who has hope an opportunity to prove themselves by going to the government. But the people themselves should try to understand whether this innocent expectation of the people and their dissatisfaction with the status quo is just a stepping stone to power or whether they have really come with the right intentions.
People should not only have sentimentality and passion, but also political wisdom and conscience. A party is not just a top leader. It should be understood that the line of the next generation is also struggling within it. Hopeful faces should not be lumped together by being influenced by the misinformation that they are all bad. Just as the quality of the species becomes purer while selecting good seeds, in the same way, if pure seeds are collected from the mainstream parties who have experience in change, revolution, diplomacy and governance, the need for improvement will also be filled. There is no need to look for hybrid grains that do not provide both nutrients and seeds.
