We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
Even if the employee resigns before going on mandatory leave, they will not be able to get appointed to another public post immediately. In the Federal Civil Service Bill, the State Order and Good Governance Committee under the House of Representatives has provided for a two-year 'cooling-off period' so that employees who resign will not be appointed to constitutional, political and diplomatic positions.
A brief conversation with Ramhari Khatiwada , chairman of the State Order and Good Governance Committee about the committee making such a provision:
Federal Civil Bill is now at which stage of the parliamentary process?
We have discussed with experts, constitutional commissions, public service commission several times and passed the bill unanimously by the committee and sent the bill to the parliament.
What is the interest of the Chief Secretary, the General Secretary of the Parliament and other employees in the 'cooling-off period'?
Even today, the most interest is in the 'cooling period'. They are saying - if possible, remove it and submit it to the parliament. They have worked for the nation for 30-35 years, we are asking them to freshen up for two years and join the national service. But they have to be deprived forever. Regarding the 'cooling-off period', we have not only said civil service, we have included other government services as well. There is a tendency to appoint the secretary and chief secretary the day before the
in the constitutional body. Due to this, there may be a case against himself in the place where he is appointed. A 'cooling-off period' is going to be arranged so that people should not go to such places and do things that conflict with their interests. The employee also argues that the age of retirement is 60 years and after 2 years of cooling, they cannot work. Nowadays, a person becomes a secretary at the age of 48. 52-54 years when going on retirement. Even with a 2 year cooling off period, age will kill it. It was found that the idea that this law should be made in order to benefit only them has been developed in the leadership of the employees.
Will there be amendments before the report is submitted to the House of Representatives?
The government can accept some things in the parliament. It is not possible for me to amend anything, even if the Prime Minister, the party president says, no amendment is possible now.
