The winter session of the federal parliament is known as the legislative session. But like in the past, this time too, the long pending bill was not finalized. The effectiveness of the Parliament is being raised due to activities such as low attendance of MPs in the meeting and not reaching the quorum, committees not being active, meetings being disrupted due to disagreements between the government and the opposition.

In this context, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Devraj Ghimiresag, Rajesh Mishra and Jaisingh Mahara of Kantipur:

  Some committees are also in chaos, MPs are doing the work of speaking outside the rules and regulations 

The misuse of emergency time by MPs has increased,

will not be known until we know who the MPs are absconding 

The situation of teachers coming to the streets should be stopped immediately, they should be informed that the bill has gone too far

It is not necessary to remove a member of parliament by asking for the removal of his post, saying that he did such and such, crying or protesting.

This time the winter session of the Parliament started late and ended quickly, why?

Earlier, the winter session was usually closed in the second week of March. It did not stop suddenly. It could have lasted a few days. After a few days, more bills were likely to be passed. It is arranged that the Parliament should give suggestions to the government about the principles and priorities of the budget 15 days before the budget speech. The government always used to conduct pre-budget discussions, and bring policies and programs and then submit the budget. To ensure that this is not the case, the policy and program will be discussed first. The government is ready to discuss the principles and priorities of the budget only after the policy program comes. The argument of the government was that if the winter session is prolonged, it will be difficult to arrange the time. 

The convention held only 27 meetings in 61 days. Only 11 bills including 5 ordinances were passed. Shouldn't the achievement of a convention be just that?

 During the 61 days, there were interruptions from time to time. Parliament was interrupted while passing the 5 Ordinance Replacement Bills. It had an effect. Had there not been obstruction, the other three bills could have been passed. 

It sounds like the convention was ended early because of your trip abroad? No

, nothing to do with ending my foreign-travel convention. In the past, I have gone abroad twice during the course of Parliament. It is also based on the government's plan and thinking about how the parliament session will go. 

Prime Minister while speaking in Parliament on January 18 complained that it is taking more than half a decade to pass a bill. How do you take this event?

It is the duty of Parliament to make laws. If the law is not passed collectively in time, it will affect the governance. However, it is not practical and proper to create a law based only on some technical matter that the law must be passed within a certain time. Why is a law not passed for a long time? It should be explored. Parliament is not working? Is the delay due to lack of consensus among political parties or due to changes in the balance of power of political parties? It must be sought. There is a problem in moving forward with the bill without all things being agreed. Like, the civil service bill was introduced in the previous parliament. He was in Parliament for a long time. It was progressing in one way. However, it was not passed. The term of Parliament is over. Came again now. Even now it took a long time. Many parties are responsible for that. 

How do you find the role of the government in the parliament in the law-making process? It seems that the government does not want to advance some of the bills.

A law that the government does not agree with cannot be passed. The government is made by the parliament. He has the majority in the parliament. 

To say that the government is accountable to the parliament means that the government has a majority in the parliament. If the government does not move the bill, the parliament moves a bill and it fails. It is understood that the government and the parliament are separate. Although they are different in terms of power, they are related to each other in terms of relationships. Because the government is formed through the parliament. Passing laws without the government's consent is difficult. That means Parliament is not a shadow of the government. However, since the government has a majority in the parliament, the situation remains that the government will accept what it wants. 

Theoretically, it is said that the legislature makes the law, the executive executes it, and the judiciary interprets it. However, how to understand the situation where the government does not want to make a law? That's the

thing. Legislature will make laws. The executive will implement it. But who brought the law? The government has brought it. Now he wants to pass that law only if it does what he wants. If not, it won't. 

At the end of the previous parliament, 21 such bills were left. In which the government and Parliament had already invested a lot of time. However, there was no decision on that at the time. Even now, the passage of the bills is being delayed. Will it have the same result tomorrow?

In the past, there was a provision that the bill would automatically become inactive after the end of the term of the House of Representatives. There was a position to go to zero. Now there is a provision that the Parliament can take ownership of the pending works and take them forward. It has opened the way for the continuation of the bill and other things. Parliament is an inseparable institution, therefore, the practice of carrying on old matters can be developed. Even if the new parliament doesn't want to go with the old one, there can be a discussion. However, it is not necessary to leave the work to be done during your period. At least the work should be done within time. A calendar had to be arranged for that. 

It has been seen that you yourself repeatedly pointed out and drew the attention of the chairpersons of the committee to prioritize the bill and finish it quickly. How does that  Did the

result? Why did the

stop? What is not enough? What happens? When I thought that, something happened. However, that alone is not enough. What has been stopped will not happen without untying the knot. It picks up speed slowly. However, the conclusion will not be reached. Finding the deadlock and breaking it requires consensus among the political parties. Due to lack of consensus among the leaders, some bills keep moving in the committee. In some cases, it takes momentum after advancing through the party. It has also been seen that the committees are active and can give results quickly when the initiative is taken from the leadership level of the party. 

Right now, teachers across the country are on street protests demanding school education laws. Similarly, there is a continuous protest of the provincial governments saying that other laws related to the implementation of federalism, such as civil service, have not been enacted. The government says that the bill is in the parliament and shows it before the parliament. This has started to raise questions on the role of the parliament from many sides? 

As there is a majority in the parliament, his role in the government is greater. How much will the government and parties be ready to reach an agreement on any bill? This turns out to be important. A deadlock is not just a meeting being stopped, boycotted. Not being able to make a decision in the work of the committee is also not being able to reach a conclusion. All parties should be responsible in these matters. The government says that the Parliament did not give the law. The Parliament says that the government did not move forward to find an exit. These two things are intertwined. That's why it's not an accusation, but you have to fulfill your responsibility and make a conclusion. 

The constitution says that the bill passed by the House of Representatives must be sent back by the National Assembly within a certain time. However, regarding the same bill sent by the National Assembly, no time has been set for the House of Representatives. Can't the House of Representatives itself set a timetable? 

Discussions and discussions have been going on in that regard. However, it is better to develop a routine that can be done within the time frame without creating any compelling circumstances. There is a discussion about how fair and unfair it is to fix the time. 

Parliamentary committees can play a role in holding the government accountable. However, the committees have not been able to work effectively? It seems that the Public Accounts Committee is not active?  The work of

committees reflects the effectiveness of Parliament. We are doing things to make it effective. There will be engagement throughout the term of the House. The situation of having to go to their constituencies after the end of the session may not be as effective as the committees say in terms of saving some time. Another committee is also affected by the lack of financial, practical, ideological and policy support it needs to make it more effective. Committees may also be ineffective due to deficiencies in implementing some of the decisions and conclusions made by the committee and implementing them carefully and giving results. The effectiveness of the parliament is linked to the work of the committees. We are focusing on how to make the parliamentary committees dynamic, identifying what the

ing difficulties are and how to make them dynamic.  Don't you feel that

committees are distracted from their core responsibilities and busy with other things?

Some committees are also in trouble. What are the ideological tasks of the committees? It is trying to happen in the absence of clear guidelines. We are trying to bring it in place. 

There is a complaint that what the parliamentarians said in the parliament did not get importance, the government did not listen to it?  The

has two aspects. Demand-based expressions belong to MPs. It is not possible for the government to meet those demands due to its limits and plans. The MP says that this road should be built but it cannot be built. That is a matter of the government's ability and plan. But there are some questions, information that should be made public. In such matters, the state ignores the issues raised by MPs. These two things should be looked at differently and the government should also respond to these things immediately.

Comparatively, now the government will respond and the minister will clearly develop. There is a provision that you should reply within 7 days. Within seven days, the matter of answering the questions raised by the MP is not being developed. 

If the government is not implementing the instructions given by the parliament, should the parliament take the initiative?

Parliament is the direct focus of the people. It is a place where the demands and wishes of the people are expressed. MPs raise people's wishes and needs so that they are implemented. What is the ability of the government to implement those things? The government cannot work beyond its capacity. These things are also caused by the contradiction between them. There are limits to the government's work capacity and economic conditions. There is no match between these things and the demand. 

There have been questions that you did not show generosity in allowing MPs to speak in this convention, how have you reviewed it? 

The problem is not to control what is said in our parliament, but how to bring it within the scope of law and constitution. MPs are doing the work of going beyond the rules and regulations.  MPs accuse you of not allowing you to speak during

emergencies, right? A

is not a conventional speaking time. If something urgent has come up and the House must be informed, then speak. However, it is said that I should not have told during an emergency and they say that corruption is happening in the country and good governance is not happening. Now there is another time to talk about things like that there is no good governance, there is corruption. If anyone wants to speak, they should have prior information about what they want to speak about and whether they should give time or not. After telling the

, the Speaker had to think whether what the MP said was accidental or not? 

That subject had to be accidental. The subject had to be topical and urgent rather than what the speaker thought. Allowed to speak, does not become a topical and casual topic. Taking time to speak on this topic, but talking about a different topic, the misuse of time increased. 

There is a constitutional provision that the position of MP who is absent in 10 consecutive meetings will be vacant. The MP is absconding in cooperative fraud, the court has issued an arrest warrant and the security apparatus is looking for him. But the Parliament has approved the leave and provided the salary allowance to the absconding MP as he is on medical leave?  Parliament will not know about

who is absconding, who is sick, who is facing a case. Someone's on sick leave, is it really sick or pretending? In the hospital or at home? It is not a body that investigates everything. If a member of parliament receives a letter saying that he is sick, needs leave, has work abroad or at home, the parliament does not know whether he is sued or not.  The warrant was released from court against

SPRO. That person has not been able to help the state body in investigation. What is the process of information about the parliament in such a situation?

is not a parliament for investigating what is doing. What Some Some MPs are doing in the field of activities is just a matter what he said, just as he says. The official information about what has happened outside and he knows. & Nbsp; It is the information that

is absconding. The letter comes to absconding. Letter comes to arrest people who are arrested. It is something we know when we come. When you find out what to do & NBSP;

is a matter of the parliament. But that did not come to know. & NBSP; The teacher is in a street movement that

School Education Bill. At what time does this bill end to the Parliamentary Committee and is the next convention? The first priority of the upcoming convention is a budget for the

. This is also the school education bill in priority together. This bill must be brought. The aggression is also going on for this. This movement is a position to support repatriarians. That is why I have to endure the responsibility of the responsibility of conducting meetings, the teachers, which comes on the road, may end. They should be assured that the bill must have grown long ago. They need to understand what they think is what they think. What they are doing today are talking about the law, often the support of their demands. I have a situation that assured that you reassure it that your law will return and support an effective environment, disbelief. & Nbsp;

letting you fluently, River-Lai Lai Ichhahh met you twice in the middle. What did you get up at the meeting? & NBSP; The

Parliament is to implement what Nepal's law's legal system says to suspend him or not. He is informed that the provision that the MPspaist will be considered to be suspended after the case. & Nbsp;

Public Party also complaining that the referendum did not protect his lawmaker, how have you seen it?

is a legal arrangement that do the way to be free. Political parties, the election Act of the election Act is evident that the MPs of MPsake is vacant. That does the verse if he does. Not to remove it, not that, removal, remove, and rebuke it by crying, shouting or opposition. The law had to understand the law that the arrangement has made. The

ri said that he was being able to address the rostrrum, said that it was not acceptable to the constitution. Is it intent to try to stop the matter in the parliament, no matter how much the constitution can be able to stop it in the parliament? The

constitution is not an expression in the communication. There is a good effort to describe the monarchy to establish the monarchy against the republic of efforts. But the prime minister's concern is that the PM's concern is that it should be controlled against what has been sworn in what he has been sworn in. In that direction they must follow ourselves, speak, speak. I also need to control if you do not. Unmarked) may go to the position to be taken legal action to be taken against. At the beginning of the

Parliament Last, the presence of MPs should be good, but it should be played by the bell without reaching aid for a bill. What roles do you play in the end of this situation? The Samps are present by looking at the seriousness of

. It attends what you want or know what you want and go out when it comes. To make such a warning of such responsibilities to be seriously alerting, it will not be present if the work has to go. Once the appearance of the day, we need to say that the day that dwellers lived to the final development and bringing the attention of living in discipline through the party. It has been felt that progress has been done.

are also criticizing the law by criticizing the parliamentary. Is this a serious matter or not?

they must meet their obligations. But opposers are settled with their destiny, or against the opposition, and they are exaggerating. Nepal's lawmaker has a very reasonable difficulty. This is not what happens to the way Kheckur commentary. Problems have been active in the presence, but they have been made in vocational manners, the basis, and nbsp;

  How is the Story-BREAP Parliament to the convention convention? & NBSP;

comes based on our budget policies. All lawsmakers and programs are enough amount of law. It is finalized the policy on the basis of consideration. The policy should be made effective. After forming the policy, the budget should be allocated for the budget. For that, MP should be played role. & Nbsp; The

This government is that the government is on the pre-budget discussion based on the first policy and based on. We are saying that we were mainly to complete the budget in the allotted time. The school education, the federal civil service bill is tries to complete the bill to amend the Bills to amend some Nepal Act. & NBSP; The

has been completed half of the parliament of this Parliament and the law has become 27 during this period. What can be expected in the formation of laws that need the constitution and federalism of Parliament?

should look at how many laws are needed rather than watching yesterday. Many laws were required in the past. The new constitution came from another system and drafted. Constituted constitution would not have to be constructed and binding the law in critical way. The ordinance replacement Bill has passed since it was binding. & Nbsp; Due to the instability of the instability of the