Charge-sheet filed against eight people including chief administrative officer in special court
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
The Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority has filed a charge sheet in the special court against eight people, including chief administrative officer of Saptari's Dakneshwari municipality, Ram Kisun Yadav, on Wednesday for corruption in the installation of LED street lights.
Along with officer Yadav, engineers Kulanand Viraji and Ramakant Chaudhary, sub-engineer Sanjay Kumar Yadav, planning officer Vinod Kumar Thakur, accountant Anita Parivar, fifth assistant working in the planning branch Nikita Chaudhary, GS Construction Services and proprietor Vijaykumar Yadav have filed a charge sheet.
In the financial year 2078/079, the budget was allocated and the contract was awarded for the connection work. After purchasing and installing the state light, the entire amount allocated was submitted to the municipality and submitted to the municipality in the middle of June. Authority claims .
Dakneshwari Municipality In 2078/079, 48 lakh 24 thousand 874 rupees related to installation of 148 LED street lights in all wards of the city In the procurement process with a successful score, the corrupt collusion with the contractor contrary to the prevailing public procurement act, rules and procedures, which caused illegal benefits to themselves and illegal damage to the Dakneshwari municipality, and prepared a completed report by evaluating the cost estimate and the works that were not done in the field according to the completed report. The claim is .
When preparing the cost estimate, the basis of confirmation and without numbers, the cost estimate was prepared by keeping the abnormal price and the payment was made by keeping the price higher than the market price, totaling 25 lakh 4 thousand 530 rupees. The authority says that it has been confirmed that the public property has been damaged.
