In the meeting of the Madhesh Pradesh Assembly last Wednesday, Physical Infrastructure Development Minister Saroj Kumar Yadav announced the list of plan distribution.

While reading the details of the plans taken by the MP and the party, he insisted that more than 200 plans have not been signed yet. Minister Yadav indicated that due to the greed of the commission, the parliamentarians have not yet registered the plan in the ward and have not signed an agreement. However, Minister Yadav, who became angry after being accused of 'selling the plan', was not ready to give it to the Kantipur workers when he asked for the list of plan distribution.

Whenever the minister is accused, he makes a revealing statement . This time too, Minister Yadav had warned to open the polls of MPs from the House. However, he hesitated to bring out the evidence. However, apart from the Chief Minister and the Minister, the details of which party's parliamentarians have taken how many schemes have been obtained numerically. 

It has been found that 248 ruling Congress MPs, 240 UML MPs, 163 MPs and 94 MPs of the Democratic Socialist Party (LOSP) of Nepal have taken the scheme . The main opposition party Janata Samajwadi Party (JSP) has 174 MPs, Maoist MPs 64, CPN Unified Samajwadi MPs 56, Civil Liberties 5, RPP 4 and Nepal Federal Samajwadi Party MPs 2 plans. 

'About 200 plans that have been proposed by the honorable people have not been agreed upon yet . Neither has it been registered in the ward office," he said in the House, "where did that plan go? Where has the letter been going for two months? I want an answer .'

According to Minister Yadav, MPs took 13 letters of plans to Parsa two months ago . However, it has not yet been registered in the ward, nor has there been an agreement with the relevant office. Minister Yadav indicated that the MP who accused him of buying and selling the scheme was looking for a middleman with a letter. 

Minister Yadav informed that 37 projects in Bara, 31 in Rautahat, 14 in Sarlahi, 11 in Mahottari, and 36 in Sirha are stalled. He said that all the letters of this plan were taken away by the MPs.

Fake consumer committee
Last March 13, the ward office of Dhanusha Kamala municipality-4 sent a letter to the infrastructure development office of Dhanusha. In the current financial year, the letter of the three plans given by the office to the ward was not available, so the letter was about informing. The names of the three schemes of 25-25 lakhs were also mentioned in the letter addressed to the Ministry of Physical Infrastructure Development of the Madhesh State Government. However, Ward President Deepak Gohibar is still unaware of that plan.

According to him, those plans have not been registered in the ward yet. The physical infrastructure office had already prepared to form a consumer committee on the 29th of January in the name of the ward office. However, he suspects that the plan has not been registered in the ward as the letter fell into the hands of an intermediary. Ward president Gohibar was not satisfied and reached the infrastructure office on 16th of Chaitra. He found that a consumer committee had been formed with the signature of Shiladevi Mandal, the deputy head of Kamala Municipality. Ward president Gohibar called the deputy mayor soon after he couldn't believe it. After calling from the head of the office Ramkishore Sah, the deputy chief said that no consumer committee has been formed and that matter is beyond his jurisdiction . The Deputy Head Mandal sent a letter to that office last Monday and requested to stop the contract as the consumer committee was constituted with her fake signature. Head of Infrastructure Development Office Sah assured Ward President Gohibar that he will send another letter to the ward to form a consumer committee. However, Ward President Gohibar has not yet received the letter. According to him, the CPN-UML leader, against the law, has been active in forming a consumer committee in the village again by carrying the letter from the Infrastructure Office. 

An incident of the same nature has also been seen in Dhanushadham municipality-6. In those wards, the letter of the scheme placed in the Madhesh province government's red book has not been received in the ward, so they have sent a letter to the infrastructure office to provide it. Ward president Rishikesh Lama said that despite sending the letter on 17th of Chait, no planning letter has been registered in the ward.

He alleges that people close to the Speaker of Madhesh Pradesh, Ramchandra Mandal, formed a consumer committee against the law in all the plans of the ward. Letters from the infrastructure office come to the ward. After that, a consumer committee is formed by holding a public meeting,'' said Lama, "However, the UML leaders formed a fake consumer committee without registering the letter in the ward against the law."

These examples of Kamala and Dhanushadham are representative only. Saroj Kumar Mishra, a youth from Janakpurdham, said that such disputes are seen in most places of Madhesh province. According to him, consumer committee has not been formed in any place except from public meeting . "Only 20 percent of the scheme work is done according to the law," he said, "all agencies and individuals form their own consumer committees to easily get commission."

He argued that the provincial government keeps the small and medium scheme to nurture workers and for commission only. He said that by not having a master plan, the ministers and parliamentarians of the Madhesh government are pursuing personal interests. He says that people should be aware of this. 

Head of Infrastructure Development Office Dhanusha Ram Kishore Sah said that he has received a letter about the fake consumer committee. However, he insists that the plan has not been implemented yet. Such letters have also come to the office. "We are also aware of the fake consumer committee," he said, "but the plans you mentioned have not yet been implemented." Regarding the fact that a letter was given to an intermediary against the law without giving the letter of the consumer committee to the ward office, he said that he was busy and would talk later. What is the