कान्तिपुर वेबसाईट
AdvertisementAdvertisement
२१.१२°C काठमाडौं
काठमाडौंमा वायुको गुणस्तर: ९८
जसपा नेपाल विभाजित

Upendra, who is in the running to become the Prime Minister, is in crisis as Deputy Prime Minister

After the exercise of forming a new alliance in which Sher Bahadur Deuba, Madhav Nepal and Upendra Yadav will alternate as Prime Minister, JSP broke due to the activism of Dahal and Oli.
Deputy Prime Minister and Health Minister Yadav, who is on a visit to the US, is likely to be relieved of his post without coming home, preparations are underway to replace him with a member of parliament from a divided group.
Disclaimer

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

Upendra Yadav, who is also the Deputy Prime Minister, is trying to topple the current government, and the majority of the MPs have divided the party and registered a new party. Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Health, who is also the party president, is on a visit to the US, while 7 MPs, including two ministers representing the party, have joined the new party. Now there are 5 MPs including him in the party president's group.

Upendra, who is in the running to become the Prime Minister, is in crisis as Deputy Prime Minister


Since the reorganization of the cabinet led by Maoist Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal, Jaspa Nepal has been in internal conflict. JSP President Yadav, who announced publicly that he had formed an alliance with UML, Maoist and RSVP on February 21, had to work very hard to get the decision approved by the party. After a long exercise, Yadav became Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Health by making Navalkishore Sah Sudi the Minister of State for Forest and Environment and Deepak Karki in the same ministry. However, Minister Sudi has also left Yadav's leadership.

There is a possibility that Deputy Prime Minister and Health Minister Yadav, who is on a visit to America, will be relieved of his post without coming home. The coalition leadership is preparing to appoint a new party MP as a minister instead. The new party is led by Ashok Rai who is also an MP.

Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba is preparing for an alternative alliance after the collaboration with the Maoists was unexpectedly broken. Prime Minister Dahal and UML President KP Sharma Oli were trying to cancel it by saying that not only Madhav Kumar Nepal, President of United Samajwadi Party, but JSP President Yadav was with him. "Especially the roles of Madhav Nepal and Upendra Yadav created doubts within the alliance. Dahal and Oli understood that even though both parties are in the government, they are constantly in dialogue with the Congress President," a UML leader told Kantipur. The alliance has made a new strategy. According to a leader of the ruling party, after several talks between Deuba, Nepal and Yadav, an agreement was reached between them to divide the remaining term and become the prime minister. He also commented that 'some have stomach ache'. Therefore, Dahal and Oli have now weakened Yadav and this example may also cause problems for Madhav Nepal.

Upendra Yadav himself was going to destroy the current alliance by becoming the prime minister, so Dahal and Oli have divided the JSP. Now the possibility of an immediate alternative government has disappeared. Instead, the transition of division can move to the unified socialist leadership of Nepal.' Minister Sah also claimed that they formed a new party after the party leadership tried to collapse the alliance. This is an internal matter within the party. An attempt was made to topple the government that was in power. So we took this step. Our move will not affect the power equation, rather we will strengthen this equation and the government," he said. The leaders claim that the internal dispute of the party is the main reason for the JSP split rather than geopolitical influence.

MP Pradeep Yadav of the divided Jaspa said that the party had to split after there was no change in the party president's work style. He said that the party and the parliamentary party rebelled because the chairman treated his colleagues like bonded labourers. Don't even consult with anyone, you should say what you say. We are like bonded laborers," he said. "In the upcoming convention, the president had prepared to give responsibility only to those close to him. He wanted to end it by making only those who write in his favor on social media and not giving membership to those who have different opinions. That's why we took a new path. Rajendra Shrestha, the chairman of the federal council of the divided party, also claims that the alliance has not weakened but has become stronger. He says, 'Political instability brings crisis in the country. Therefore, we are not in favor of making right-left alliances, this is not done to break the alliance, rather it makes it stronger. He accused party president Yadav of always ignoring the party system. At the meeting six months ago, they said that if we travel together, let's create a positive atmosphere within the party. But it didn't happen. An agreement is made, but not implemented. Agreed again, not implemented. Shrestha said, "It has reached a foot position because of the lack of political honesty." The convention of Jaspa is being held from May 28.

Manish Suman, spokesperson of Upendra-led Jaspa in Nepal, also says that internal reasons are the main reason behind the party's split. According to him, some leaders accused of dividing the party because they are worried that they will not get the role they are getting now after the upcoming convention of the party. He claimed that he was not against the leadership alliance. Some friends left the party. He committed his own political murder. It's not going to hurt anyone. Our participation with the ruling coalition will not end. Not even thought differently. The alliance will remain until the next election," Suman said, "The allegation that the leadership is trying to go to an alternative alliance is false."

On the other hand, the bitterness between the president of United Samajwadi Nepal and UML president KP Oli, who is in the role of Prime Minister in the then alliance with Congress-Maoist, is increasing within the alliance. Even though Oli promised to keep it in the Prime Minister's roll order during the vote of confidence, Oli has been warning that Nepal will leave the alliance saying that he is dissatisfied after he rejected it last time.

Rajendra Pandey, the vice-president of the United Socialist Party, comments that the Dahal-led power equation is in the midst of a crisis as the power-travelling parties started to be chosen. "Even though it looks like there is no immediate problem, the alliance has become weaker due to the division within Jaspa, I don't think it will continue for a long time," he said.

Maoist leader Devendra Paudel claims that there is no immediate problem within the alliance. "It's not good to be broke. It would be better if we all went together. However, because of this, the alliance is not in trouble. Although there are not two groups within Jaspa, we believe that one group will remain in the government," he said.

While there is a struggle within the power coalition, some leaders are also trying to create a new power equation between Congress and UML. Within the Congress, leaders including leader Shekhar Koirala and Chief Minister Gagan Thapa are in favor of the Congress-UML equation. Shekhar had a long discussion with UML President Oli last Wednesday and Thapa a few days ago. However, Chairman Deuba is not ready to make an equation with UML.

Congress leader Minendra Rizal says that it will be difficult to go for the alternative of equation between Congress and UML only for power without agreement on national agenda. It is necessary to amend the electoral system for stability. He says that the coalition formed without understanding on the agenda of constitutional amendment, prosperity and good governance has no meaning.

There is a proposal for Rizal to reduce the current 110 proportional seats to 60 seats. "If there is an agreement on this, we can go to a new alliance by including UML-Congress or other parties under the leadership of these two parties for some time," Rizal said. No.'

'The main reason for division is Upendraji'

Mohammad Istiaq Rai, JSP leader

When the president was abroad, how did the party suddenly have to be divided?

is definitely not a sudden preparation. There was already controversy in the party. It was coming out from time to time. Vijay Gachchdar, JP Gupta, Mahant Thakur, Baburam Bhattarai, Rajendra Mahato, Mahendra Rai Yadav could not survive because of the working style of the President. Even Ashok Rai could not be respected. In the party, a leader with a profile, who has public opinion is not liked, not allowed to become a leader, and it is done. This did not happen suddenly. It is the result of long-standing discontent.

This is the only reason why the party had to be divided?

tried to single out the party convention last time. By cheating against the law, removing the elected presidents of the provinces and districts when we were absent, distributing them to those close to us, and not going through the district and party leaders. The party meeting was not held on time. In the Congress, there was a heikmatist tendency in the leadership to isolate.

There was a feeling in the party that everyone should be given an opportunity, that whoever is elected according to the process and method, will be the president. But he tried to stop it. He singlehandedly got himself elected and started working. Another thing, even in power, sometimes it moves here, sometimes it moves there, it is not stable. When the government changed frequently, and the provincial government also started changing, the question of federalism also started to arise. Therefore, steps have been taken as a long-term front and to stabilize the government. We have reached the decision to form a separate party with the feeling that we should move forward in terms of collective leadership, not from the heikmanist tendency in the party.

Even when the vote of confidence was given to the Prime Minister, there was a heated debate within the Jaspa about whether to participate in the government or not. Is that the result now?

is not like that. There was a dispute within the party, not since then, but for a long time. At the time of the vote of confidence in the government, there was no dispute about making him a minister. After trying to proceed in a single way in the convention, the situation has worsened and we are forced to take the current decision.

Is the message going that you split the party to change the power alliance? Not a

. So far there has been no crisis in the alliance. We are in favor of the continuation of the alliance. What to make a new alliance? Bringing instability again? Change the governments in the seven provinces after the change of coalition at the center? What message does it convey? We want a stable government when the country's economic situation is weak.

Jaspa is trying to imply that geopolitical reasons are also connected to the partition, what do you say?

is nothing geopolitical. Upendraji is the main reason for this division. Upendraji's instincts and actions are responsible. If we were wrong, how could Mahant, JP, Vijay, Rajendra, Baburam be all wrong? Why are such senior leaders unable to last because of one person? A man like Baburam Bhattarai, who has become the prime minister, came by accepting the leadership. However, it could not last. Mahant Thakur, Vijay Kumar Gachchdar are all senior to Upendra Yadav. However, they were forced to leave the party. We hoped for improvement. But it didn't happen. That is why this decision had to be taken.

There is also talk of unification with UML?

Why did you have to merge with UML? If we were to integrate, it could be done directly. There was an arrangement in the law. Our party has a name, agenda and constitution. We don't need to integrate. We go with our own case. Let's make a party .

प्रकाशित : वैशाख २४, २०८१ ०६:०५
प्रतिक्रिया
पठाउनुहोस्
जनताको राय

यातायात व्यवस्था कार्यालयहरूले ट्रायल फेल भएका १९ सयलाई किर्ते गरी लाइसेन्स वितरण गरेको सार्वजनिक भएको छ। यस्तो विकृत्ति रोक्न मुख्य रुपमा के गर्नुपर्छ ?

×